DIVL vs. MFVL

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DIVL (Madison Dividend Value ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIVL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFVL.

Performance

DIVL vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVL achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's -1.85% return.

DIVL

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -2.16%
• YTD: 6.99%
• 6M: 5.80%
• 1Y: 12.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFVL

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: -1.85%
• 6M: -2.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVL vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DIVL Madison Dividend Value ETF	6.99%	0.39%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	-1.85%	1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVL and MFVL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025	0.40

Return for Risk

DIVL vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVL

DIVL Risk / Return Rank: 37
DIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
DIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
DIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
DIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
DIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 37

MFVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVL vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIVL	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.14	—	—

Drawdowns

DIVL vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVL drawdown since its inception was -14.06%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVL and MFVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIVL	MFVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.06%	-7.03%	-7.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.39%	-5.44%	+1.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.58%	-2.62%	+0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DIVL	MFVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.70%	12.12%	-1.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.35%	12.12%	+0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.35%	12.12%	+0.23%

DIVL vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIVL vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison

DIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DIVL Madison Dividend Value ETF	1.79%	1.80%	2.19%	1.01%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIVL and MFVL in my portfolio?

DIVL and MFVL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DIVL or MFVL?

On fees, MFVL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIVL or MFVL?

MFVL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIVL or MFVL?

DIVL has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.

What is the main difference between DIVL and MFVL?

They also come from different issuers: Madison and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVL and 0.50% for MFVL.