DIVL vs. CSTK

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK).

DIVL and CSTK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DIVL is an actively managed fund by Madison. It was launched on Aug 14, 2023. CSTK is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on May 5, 2025.

Performance

DIVL vs. CSTK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DIVL vs. CSTK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DIVL Madison Dividend Value ETF	7.03%	9.76%
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF	0.02%	18.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVL achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly higher than CSTK's 0.02% return.

DIVL

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -4.19%
• YTD: 7.03%
• 6M: 5.95%
• 1Y: 13.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSTK

• 1D: 2.30%
• 1M: -5.52%
• YTD: 0.02%
• 6M: 4.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVL vs. CSTK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CSTK's 0.35% expense ratio.

DIVL

Madison Dividend Value ETF

CSTK

Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF

Return for Risk

DIVL vs. CSTK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVL

DIVL Risk / Return Rank: 52
DIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
DIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
DIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 52
DIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
DIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVL vs. CSTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DIVL	CSTK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.61	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DIVL	CSTK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	1.78	-0.92

Correlation

The correlation between DIVL and CSTK is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DIVL vs. CSTK - Dividend Comparison

DIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than CSTK's 1.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DIVL Madison Dividend Value ETF	1.77%	1.80%	2.19%	1.01%
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF	1.97%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DIVL vs. CSTK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVL drawdown since its inception was -14.06%, which is greater than CSTK's maximum drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVL and CSTK.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIVL	CSTK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.06%	-8.87%	-5.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.36%	-6.78%	+2.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.52%	-1.26%	-1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DIVL	CSTK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.99%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.37%	11.70%	+2.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.45%	11.70%	+0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.45%	11.70%	+0.75%