PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVL vs. CVRD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVL vs. CVRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) and Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVL achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly higher than CVRD's -1.00% return.


DIVL

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
7.33%
6M
6.66%
1Y
13.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CVRD

1D
-0.25%
1M
-4.20%
YTD
-1.00%
6M
-0.80%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVL vs. CVRD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DIVL
Madison Dividend Value ETF
7.33%9.83%8.81%2.67%
CVRD
Madison Covered Call ETF
-1.00%5.94%4.90%4.74%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVL and CVRD is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023

0.75

The correlation between DIVL and CVRD shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIVL vs. CVRD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIVL
CVRD

Energy

16.5%
6.1%

Industrials

15.9%
7.2%

Financial Services

13.9%
10.4%

Healthcare

11.5%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

11.3%
9.3%

Technology

9.0%
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
8.5%

Basic Materials

6.5%
2.3%

Utilities

5.5%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.4%
3.0%

Communication Services

-

7.5%

Energy

DIVL
16.5%
CVRD
6.1%

Industrials

DIVL
15.9%
CVRD
7.2%

Financial Services

DIVL
13.9%
CVRD
10.4%

Healthcare

DIVL
11.5%
CVRD
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

DIVL
11.3%
CVRD
9.3%

Technology

DIVL
9.0%
CVRD
38.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DIVL
7.4%
CVRD
8.5%

Basic Materials

DIVL
6.5%
CVRD
2.3%

Utilities

DIVL
5.5%
CVRD
2.2%

Real Estate

DIVL
2.4%
CVRD
3.0%

Communication Services

DIVL

-

CVRD
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVL vs. CVRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVL
DIVL Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

CVRD
CVRD Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CVRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVRD Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CVRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVRD Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVL vs. CVRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) and Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVLCVRDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.09

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

0.78

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

2.30

+3.22

DIVL vs. CVRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the CVRD Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVL and CVRD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIVL vs. CVRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVL drawdown since its inception was -14.06%, smaller than the maximum CVRD drawdown of -17.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVL and CVRD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVLCVRDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.06%

-17.95%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-5.72%

-1.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.08%

-5.14%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-2.02%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

1.93%

+0.48%

Volatility

DIVL vs. CVRD - Volatility Comparison

Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) at 2.74%. This indicates that DIVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVLCVRDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

2.74%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.94%

7.12%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

9.65%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.35%

11.78%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.35%

11.78%

+0.57%

DIVL vs. CVRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CVRD's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVL vs. CVRD - Dividend Comparison

DIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than CVRD's 7.83% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CVRD
Madison Covered Call ETF
7.83%7.63%15.70%1.50%
DIVL
Madison Dividend Value ETF
1.78%1.80%2.19%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVL and CVRD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVL has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to CVRD (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVL dropped -14.06% vs CVRD's -17.95%.

On 1-year performance, DIVL leads with 13.28% vs 4.44% for CVRD. On fees, DIVL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CVRD has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVL has performed better with a 13.28% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CVRD.

CVRD has the higher dividend yield at 7.83%, compared with 1.78% for DIVL.

DIVL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CVRD is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVL and 0.90% for CVRD.

DIVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVL and CVRD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer