DIVI vs. FLKR
DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. DIVI is actively managed, while FLKR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIVI returned 13.83%/yr vs 19.96%/yr for FLKR. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
DIVI vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVI achieves a 11.74% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 116.13% return.
DIVI
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 26.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- —
FLKR
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 31.27%
- YTD
- 116.13%
- 6M
- 134.17%
- 1Y
- 242.73%
- 3Y*
- 51.55%
- 5Y*
- 19.96%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVI vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 11.74% | 34.86% | 1.77% | 18.97% | -1.21% | 16.95% | 1.29% | 22.98% | -6.73% | 0.36% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 116.13% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -21.30% | 2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVI and FLKR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.60 |
The correlation between DIVI and FLKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIVI vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIVI
FLKR
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DIVI
FLKR
Industrials
DIVI
FLKR
Technology
DIVI
FLKR
Healthcare
DIVI
FLKR
Consumer Cyclical
DIVI
FLKR
Consumer Defensive
DIVI
FLKR
Basic Materials
DIVI
FLKR
Communication Services
DIVI
FLKR
Utilities
DIVI
FLKR
Energy
DIVI
FLKR
Real Estate
DIVI
FLKR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVI vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
DIVI
FLKR
DIVI vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVI | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 5.94 | -4.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 5.28 | -2.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.74 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 10.80 | -8.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | 40.15 | -29.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVI | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 5.94 | -4.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.71 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.56 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
DIVI vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVI drawdown since its inception was -27.76%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVI and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVI | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.76% | -50.06% | +22.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.54% | -23.03% | +12.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.58% | -26.39% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.53% | -49.51% | +30.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.99% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -22.08% | +18.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 6.19% | -3.46% |
Volatility
DIVI vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) is 5.28%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 20.11%. This indicates that DIVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVI | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.28% | 20.11% | -14.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | 36.51% | -24.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 41.18% | -26.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 28.18% | -12.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 27.57% | -11.11% |
DIVI vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DIVI and FLKR have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DIVI vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
DIVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than FLKR's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 3.50% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.79% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVI and FLKR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (20.11%) compared to DIVI (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVI dropped -27.76% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 19.96% vs 13.83% for DIVI. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, DIVI has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 19.96% return vs 13.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVI and FLKR have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 1.79% for FLKR.
DIVI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.94 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVI and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer