DIV vs. IBTG
DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) and IBTG (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIV is a Dividend fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while IBTG is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIV returned 5.02%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for IBTG. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTG.
Performance
DIV vs. IBTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly higher than IBTG's 1.44% return.
DIV
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 11.63%
- 6M
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 3.95%
IBTG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- —
DIV vs. IBTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 11.63% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -11.09% |
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 1.44% | 4.40% | 3.97% | 4.34% | -8.18% | -3.04% | 3.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIV and IBTG is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.00 |
The correlation between DIV and IBTG shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIV vs. IBTG — Risk / Return Rank
DIV
IBTG
DIV vs. IBTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIV | IBTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -18.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 4.40 | -3.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 63.59 | -60.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 256.63 | -248.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIV | IBTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 8.02 | -6.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.26 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.29 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
DIV vs. IBTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, which is greater than IBTG's maximum drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and IBTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIV | IBTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.74% | -13.62% | -39.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.23% | -0.07% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | -1.33% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | -12.31% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.20% | 0.00% | -3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -4.90% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 0.02% | +1.83% |
Volatility
DIV vs. IBTG - Volatility Comparison
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF (IBTG) at 0.12%. This indicates that DIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIV | IBTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 0.12% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.11% | 0.32% | +6.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.36% | 0.52% | +9.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 3.27% | +10.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 3.45% | +14.53% |
DIV vs. IBTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTG's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIV vs. IBTG - Dividend Comparison
DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than IBTG's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 7.36% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
IBTG iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF | 3.96% | 4.03% | 4.08% | 3.61% | 2.06% | 0.66% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIV and IBTG have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIV has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to IBTG (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs IBTG's -13.62%.
On 5-year performance, DIV leads with 5.02% vs 0.84% for IBTG. On fees, IBTG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTG has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIV has performed better with a 5.02% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBTG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 3.96% for IBTG.
DIV is categorized as Dividend, while IBTG is Government Bonds. DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while IBTG tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.07% for IBTG.
IBTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.02 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIV and IBTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer