DISO vs. USL
DISO (YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - DISO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. DISO is actively managed, while USL is passively managed. Over the past year, DISO returned -8.09% vs 57.86% for USL. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. DISO charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
DISO vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DISO achieves a -10.99% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.
DISO
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- -10.99%
- 6M
- -4.80%
- 1Y
- -8.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 63.07%
- 6M
- 59.66%
- 1Y
- 57.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
DISO vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DISO YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF | -10.99% | 2.12% | 14.56% | 9.09% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 63.07% | -12.37% | 8.30% | -5.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between DISO and USL is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DISO vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
DISO
USL
DISO vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DISO | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.34 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 3.47 | -3.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 7.02 | -8.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DISO | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 | 2.04 | -2.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.01 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
DISO vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DISO drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISO and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DISO | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.62% | -89.06% | +62.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.08% | -16.76% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.46% | -38.16% | +24.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -61.46% | +53.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | 8.27% | -0.35% |
Volatility
DISO vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) is 9.07%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that DISO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DISO | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 10.53% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.10% | 23.33% | -7.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.24% | 28.54% | -8.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 30.08% | -8.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 32.35% | -10.82% |
DISO vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DISO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
DISO vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
DISO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.73%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DISO YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF | 44.73% | 38.87% | 37.33% | 6.87% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DISO and USL have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to DISO (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISO dropped -26.62% vs USL's -89.06%.
On 1-year performance, USL leads with 57.86% vs -8.09% for DISO. On fees, USL is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, DISO has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USL has performed better with a 57.86% return vs -8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USL is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for DISO.
DISO has the higher dividend yield at 44.73%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
DISO is categorized as Derivative Income, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for DISO and 0.88% for USL.
USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DISO and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer