PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DISO vs. MAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DISO vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DISO

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

MAGS

1D
3.67%
1M
5.04%
6M
3.36%
YTD
3.67%
1Y
22.31%
3Y*
31.47%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
37.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$304.05M$305.41M$288.45M

DISO vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DISO
YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF
-10.18%2.12%14.56%9.17%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
3.67%22.99%63.97%12.36%

Correlation

The correlation between DISO and MAGS is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2023

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DISO vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DISO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MAGS
MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DISO vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DISOMAGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.54

DISO vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DISO vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DISOMAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.31%

Volatility

DISO vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DISOMAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.15%

DISO vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DISO vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

DISO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.


PositionTTM202520242023
DISO
YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF
32.86%38.87%37.33%6.87%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
1.43%1.48%0.81%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


DISO and MAGS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for DISO.

DISO has the higher dividend yield at 32.86%, compared with 1.43% for MAGS.

DISO is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for DISO and 0.30% for MAGS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DISO and MAGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer