PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DISO vs. MSFO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DISO vs. MSFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) and YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DISO achieves a -10.18% return, which is significantly higher than MSFO's -18.98% return.


DISO

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
-10.18%
6M
-9.36%
1Y
-9.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSFO

1D
1.83%
1M
-10.24%
YTD
-18.98%
6M
-19.24%
1Y
-18.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISO vs. MSFO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DISO
YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF
-10.18%2.12%14.56%9.17%
MSFO
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
-18.98%15.69%10.34%18.74%

Correlation

The correlation between DISO and MSFO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2023

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DISO vs. MSFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DISO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MSFO
MSFO Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
MSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DISO vs. MSFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) and YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DISOMSFODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.87

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

-0.62

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

-1.28

+0.20

DISO vs. MSFO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISO Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is higher than the MSFO Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISO and MSFO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DISO vs. MSFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISO drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, smaller than the maximum MSFO drawdown of -29.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISO and MSFO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DISOMSFODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.62%

-29.29%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.08%

-29.29%

+11.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.68%

-25.76%

+13.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-6.84%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.38%

14.12%

-5.74%

Volatility

DISO vs. MSFO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) is 3.29%, while YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) has a volatility of 9.49%. This indicates that DISO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DISOMSFODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

9.49%

-6.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.73%

19.90%

-4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.06%

22.40%

-2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.36%

19.97%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.36%

19.97%

+1.39%

DISO vs. MSFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFO's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

DISO vs. MSFO - Dividend Comparison

DISO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.39%.


PositionTTM202520242023
DISO
YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF
40.16%38.87%37.33%6.87%
MSFO
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
46.39%33.91%35.15%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


DISO and MSFO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFO has higher volatility (9.49%) compared to DISO (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISO dropped -26.62% vs MSFO's -29.29%.

On 1-year performance, DISO leads with -9.02% vs -18.05% for MSFO. On fees, MSFO is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, DISO has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DISO has performed better with a -9.02% return vs -18.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSFO is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for DISO.

MSFO has the higher dividend yield at 46.39%, compared with 40.16% for DISO.

DISO is categorized as Derivative Income, while MSFO is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for DISO and 0.99% for MSFO.

DISO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DISO and MSFO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer