DISO vs. CRSH
DISO (YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF) and CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DISO returned -7.64% vs -18.98% for CRSH. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. DISO charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CRSH.
Performance
DISO vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DISO achieves a -11.11% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 3.70% return.
DISO
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- -11.11%
- 6M
- -4.70%
- 1Y
- -7.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRSH
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -8.50%
- YTD
- 3.70%
- 6M
- 5.11%
- 1Y
- -18.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DISO vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DISO YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF | -11.11% | 2.12% | 2.64% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 3.70% | -13.40% | -51.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between DISO and CRSH is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2024 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DISO vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
DISO
CRSH
DISO vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DISO | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.94 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | -0.57 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | -0.90 | -0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DISO | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 | -0.52 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | -0.70 | +0.92 |
Drawdowns
DISO vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DISO drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, smaller than the maximum CRSH drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISO and CRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DISO | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.62% | -63.68% | +37.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.08% | -33.45% | +15.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.58% | -59.20% | +45.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -43.15% | +35.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.96% | 21.20% | -13.24% |
Volatility
DISO vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) is 8.96%, while YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a volatility of 10.19%. This indicates that DISO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DISO | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.96% | 10.19% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.07% | 22.67% | -6.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.22% | 36.71% | -16.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 47.46% | -25.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 47.46% | -25.94% |
DISO vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DISO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
DISO vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
DISO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.81%, less than CRSH's 97.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 97.46% | 138.78% | 94.25% | 0.00% |
DISO YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF | 45.81% | 38.87% | 37.33% | 6.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DISO and CRSH have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRSH has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to DISO (8.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISO dropped -26.62% vs CRSH's -63.68%.
On 1-year performance, DISO leads with -7.64% vs -18.98% for CRSH. On fees, CRSH is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, DISO has been the lower-risk option at 8.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DISO has performed better with a -7.64% return vs -18.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRSH is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for DISO.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 97.46%, compared with 45.81% for DISO.
Their fees differ too: 1.01% for DISO and 0.99% for CRSH.
DISO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DISO and CRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer