DISO vs. AMDW
DISO (YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DISO charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.
Performance
DISO vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DISO achieves a -10.18% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 176.01% return.
DISO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- -10.18%
- 6M
- -9.36%
- 1Y
- -9.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDW
- 1D
- -7.20%
- 1M
- 12.58%
- YTD
- 176.01%
- 6M
- 174.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DISO vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DISO YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF | -10.18% | -1.72% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 176.01% | 36.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between DISO and AMDW is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DISO vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DISO | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DISO vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DISO drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISO and AMDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DISO | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.62% | -34.64% | +8.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.68% | -7.20% | -5.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -14.25% | +6.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.38% | — | — |
Volatility
DISO vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DISO | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.06% | 83.41% | -63.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.36% | 83.41% | -62.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.36% | 83.41% | -62.05% |
DISO vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
DISO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
DISO vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison
DISO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 37.14% | 34.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DISO YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF | 40.16% | 38.87% | 37.33% | 6.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DISO and AMDW have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for DISO.
DISO has the higher dividend yield at 40.16%, compared with 37.14% for AMDW.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for DISO and 0.99% for AMDW.
Find the right allocation for DISO and AMDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer