PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIPS vs. TCAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIPS vs. TCAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIPS achieves a -8.73% return, which is significantly lower than TCAL's -2.88% return.


DIPS

1D
2.87%
1M
-6.32%
YTD
-8.73%
6M
-11.40%
1Y
-26.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TCAL

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
-2.88%
6M
-2.97%
1Y
-1.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIPS vs. TCAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DIPS and TCAL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIPS vs. TCAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIPS
DIPS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DIPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIPS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DIPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIPS Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

TCAL
TCAL Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TCAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIPS vs. TCAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIPSTCALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

0.97

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

-0.27

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

-0.70

-0.66

DIPS vs. TCAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIPS Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is lower than the TCAL Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIPS and TCAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIPSTCALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.96

-0.20

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.86

-0.10

-0.76

Drawdowns

DIPS vs. TCAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIPS drawdown since its inception was -59.93%, which is greater than TCAL's maximum drawdown of -7.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIPS and TCAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIPSTCALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.93%

-7.24%

-52.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.97%

-7.00%

-26.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.85%

-5.92%

-49.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.22%

-2.02%

-36.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.49%

2.67%

+16.82%

Volatility

DIPS vs. TCAL - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF (TCAL) at 2.46%. This indicates that DIPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIPSTCALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

2.46%

+8.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.77%

7.08%

+13.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.88%

9.31%

+18.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.03%

11.25%

+26.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.03%

11.25%

+26.78%

DIPS vs. TCAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIPS has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TCAL's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIPS vs. TCAL - Dividend Comparison

DIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.49%, more than TCAL's 11.96% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


DIPS and TCAL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIPS has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to TCAL (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIPS dropped -59.93% vs TCAL's -7.24%.

On 1-year performance, TCAL leads with -1.87% vs -26.57% for DIPS. On fees, TCAL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, TCAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TCAL has performed better with a -1.87% return vs -26.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TCAL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DIPS.

DIPS has the higher dividend yield at 66.49%, compared with 11.96% for TCAL.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DIPS and 0.34% for TCAL.

TCAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIPS and TCAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer