DIPS vs. MRNY
DIPS (YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) and MRNY (YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DIPS returned -26.57% vs 47.46% for MRNY. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
DIPS vs. MRNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIPS achieves a -8.73% return, which is significantly lower than MRNY's 51.59% return.
DIPS
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -8.73%
- 6M
- -11.40%
- 1Y
- -26.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MRNY
- 1D
- 5.73%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 51.59%
- 6M
- 62.21%
- 1Y
- 47.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIPS vs. MRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.73% | -31.46% | -23.19% |
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 51.59% | -35.72% | -56.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIPS and MRNY is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2024 | -0.17 |
The correlation between DIPS and MRNY shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (all time) to -0.06 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIPS vs. MRNY — Risk / Return Rank
DIPS
MRNY
DIPS vs. MRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIPS | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.20 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 1.51 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 2.95 | -4.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIPS | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 | 0.97 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | -0.49 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
DIPS vs. MRNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIPS drawdown since its inception was -59.93%, smaller than the maximum MRNY drawdown of -82.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIPS and MRNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIPS | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.93% | -82.15% | +22.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.97% | -31.53% | -2.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.85% | -68.09% | +12.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.22% | -52.62% | +14.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.49% | 16.15% | +3.34% |
Volatility
DIPS vs. MRNY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (DIPS) is 10.68%, while YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) has a volatility of 13.36%. This indicates that DIPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIPS | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 13.36% | -2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.77% | 37.05% | -16.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.88% | 49.37% | -21.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.03% | 50.76% | -12.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.03% | 50.76% | -12.73% |
DIPS vs. MRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DIPS and MRNY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
DIPS vs. MRNY - Dividend Comparison
DIPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.49%, less than MRNY's 100.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DIPS YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF | 66.49% | 96.20% | 24.18% | 0.00% |
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 100.06% | 145.98% | 178.49% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIPS and MRNY have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRNY has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to DIPS (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIPS dropped -59.93% vs MRNY's -82.15%.
On 1-year performance, MRNY leads with 47.46% vs -26.57% for DIPS. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, DIPS has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MRNY has performed better with a 47.46% return vs -26.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIPS and MRNY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
MRNY has the higher dividend yield at 100.06%, compared with 66.49% for DIPS.
MRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIPS and MRNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer