DIM vs. QGRW
DIM (WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DIM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Index, while QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DIM returned 17.93%/yr vs 29.10%/yr for QGRW. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIM charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.
Performance
DIM vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIM achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly lower than QGRW's 15.43% return.
DIM
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 6.96%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 20.14%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- 7.90%
QGRW
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 9.03%
- YTD
- 15.43%
- 6M
- 14.57%
- 1Y
- 35.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIM vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIM WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund | 6.96% | 37.25% | 3.51% | 15.00% | 0.82% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 15.43% | 19.20% | 34.85% | 56.05% | -3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIM and QGRW is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022 | 0.55 |
The correlation between DIM and QGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIM vs. QGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIM
QGRW
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
DIM
QGRW
Industrials
DIM
QGRW
Real Estate
DIM
QGRW
-
Consumer Cyclical
DIM
QGRW
Utilities
DIM
QGRW
Consumer Defensive
DIM
QGRW
Basic Materials
DIM
QGRW
-
Communication Services
DIM
QGRW
Energy
DIM
QGRW
Healthcare
DIM
QGRW
Technology
DIM
QGRW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIM vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank
DIM
QGRW
DIM vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIM | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 2.06 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.19 | 2.75 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.35 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.32 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.26 | 9.08 | -1.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIM | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 2.06 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 1.66 | -1.36 |
Drawdowns
DIM vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIM drawdown since its inception was -61.45%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIM and QGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIM | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.45% | -24.40% | -37.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -15.44% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.13% | -24.40% | +12.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.59% | -1.33% | -2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.63% | -3.26% | -9.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 3.94% | -1.16% |
Volatility
DIM vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) is 4.20%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that DIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIM | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 4.71% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 13.67% | -2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 17.40% | -4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 21.08% | -5.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 21.08% | -4.17% |
DIM vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIM has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIM vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison
DIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than QGRW's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIM WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund | 2.85% | 3.20% | 3.58% | 4.62% | 3.96% | 3.65% | 2.53% | 3.26% | 3.28% | 2.57% | 2.94% | 2.81% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIM and QGRW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRW has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to DIM (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIM dropped -61.45% vs QGRW's -24.40%.
On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 29.10% vs 17.93% for DIM. On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DIM has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 29.10% return vs 17.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DIM.
DIM has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.07% for QGRW.
DIM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. DIM tracks WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Index, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DIM and 0.28% for QGRW.
QGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIM and QGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer