PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIHP vs. EFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DIHP vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DIHP vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DIHP
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF
2.17%28.26%0.50%19.07%-10.88%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
10.06%46.83%3.07%14.65%-6.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIHP achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 10.06% return.


DIHP

1D
2.71%
1M
-8.04%
YTD
2.17%
6M
6.84%
1Y
22.36%
3Y*
12.53%
5Y*
10Y*

EFAS

1D
2.54%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
10.06%
6M
15.25%
1Y
39.97%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DIHP vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIHP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DIHP vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIHP
DIHP Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DIHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIHP Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DIHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIHP Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIHP vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIHPEFASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

2.83

-1.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

3.51

-1.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.56

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

3.73

-1.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.82

17.19

-9.37

DIHP vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIHP and EFAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIHPEFASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.83

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.55

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between DIHP and EFAS is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DIHP vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

DIHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than EFAS's 4.54% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIHP
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF
2.14%2.02%2.30%2.17%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
4.54%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%

Drawdowns

DIHP vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIHP drawdown since its inception was -24.94%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIHP and EFAS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DIHPEFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.94%

-44.38%

+19.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-10.52%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.04%

-1.59%

-6.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-7.20%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.28%

+0.47%

Volatility

DIHP vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 5.52%. This indicates that DIHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DIHPEFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

5.52%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

8.29%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

14.22%

+1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

15.68%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

18.45%

-2.20%