DIG vs. QLD
DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - DIG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index (200%) while QLD tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DIG returned 5.32%/yr vs 36.10%/yr for QLD. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
DIG vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIG achieves a 66.35% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's 42.06% return. Over the past 10 years, DIG has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 5.32%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 36.10% annualized return.
DIG
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- 66.35%
- 6M
- 59.45%
- 1Y
- 90.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.37%
- 5Y*
- 28.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.32%
QLD
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 21.54%
- YTD
- 42.06%
- 6M
- 37.45%
- 1Y
- 85.49%
- 3Y*
- 50.15%
- 5Y*
- 25.75%
- 10Y*
- 36.10%
DIG vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 66.35% | 2.73% | 0.93% | -13.04% | 125.34% | 115.63% | -70.36% | 12.51% | -40.11% | -7.39% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 42.06% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIG and QLD is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007 | 0.45 |
The correlation between DIG and QLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DIG vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIG
QLD
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
DIG
QLD
Financial Services
DIG
QLD
Basic Materials
DIG
-
QLD
Communication Services
DIG
-
QLD
Consumer Cyclical
DIG
-
QLD
Consumer Defensive
DIG
-
QLD
Healthcare
DIG
-
QLD
Industrials
DIG
-
QLD
Real Estate
DIG
-
QLD
Technology
DIG
-
QLD
Utilities
DIG
-
QLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIG vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
DIG
QLD
DIG vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIG | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.41 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 3.42 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.65 | 11.92 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIG | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 2.70 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.58 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.81 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.60 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
DIG vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIG drawdown since its inception was -97.04%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIG and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIG | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.04% | -83.13% | -13.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.29% | -25.13% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.41% | -42.29% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.02% | -63.68% | +17.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.53% | -63.68% | -28.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.27% | -0.53% | -50.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.37% | -18.17% | -46.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.49% | 7.20% | +1.29% |
Volatility
DIG vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) has a higher volatility of 16.56% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 8.90%. This indicates that DIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIG | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.56% | 8.90% | +7.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.14% | 24.08% | +9.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.88% | 31.85% | +9.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.59% | 44.74% | +6.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.81% | 44.56% | +13.25% |
DIG vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DIG and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
DIG vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
DIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than QLD's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 1.50% | 2.62% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 1.33% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 2.72% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 1.56% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIG and QLD have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIG has higher volatility (16.56%) compared to QLD (8.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIG dropped -97.04% vs QLD's -83.13%.
On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 36.10% vs 5.32% for DIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 36.10% return vs 5.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIG and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
DIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.
DIG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index (200%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIG and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer