PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIEM vs. FLKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DIEM vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DIEM vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
5.34%30.81%12.29%15.41%-20.61%6.92%1.27%12.23%-11.29%2.92%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
27.39%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-21.30%2.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIEM achieves a 5.34% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 27.39% return.


DIEM

1D
3.69%
1M
-8.22%
YTD
5.34%
6M
11.28%
1Y
34.56%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*

FLKR

1D
2.41%
1M
-14.74%
YTD
27.39%
6M
53.78%
1Y
128.35%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DIEM vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIEM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

DIEM vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIEM
DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIEM vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIEMFLKRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

3.66

-1.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

3.85

-1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.55

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

5.74

-2.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.28

22.99

-11.71

DIEM vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIEM and FLKR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIEMFLKRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

3.66

-1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.33

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.33

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between DIEM and FLKR is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DIEM vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

DIEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than FLKR's 3.04% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.90%2.99%4.92%4.45%6.31%4.06%2.75%5.98%3.87%2.61%0.35%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
3.04%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%0.00%

Drawdowns

DIEM vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIEM drawdown since its inception was -38.61%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIEM and FLKR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DIEMFLKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.61%

-50.06%

+11.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-23.03%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.34%

-49.51%

+16.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.09%

-16.79%

+7.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-22.44%

+12.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

5.75%

-2.70%

Volatility

DIEM vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) is 9.47%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 19.74%. This indicates that DIEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DIEMFLKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.47%

19.74%

-10.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

30.25%

-16.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.43%

35.28%

-16.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.38%

26.00%

-9.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

26.40%

-8.99%