PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHS vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHS vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHS achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 18.62% return. Over the past 10 years, DHS has underperformed FDL with an annualized return of 9.67%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.08% annualized return.


DHS

1D
0.35%
1M
1.94%
6M
9.42%
YTD
17.07%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
12.40%
10Y*
9.67%
ALL TIME*
8.26%

FDL

1D
0.39%
1M
3.67%
6M
9.83%
YTD
18.62%
1Y
28.15%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.10%
10Y*
11.08%
ALL TIME*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.47M$3.71M$2.99M
$51.38M$49.50M$43.21M

DHS vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
17.07%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%23.20%-5.70%22.59%-7.41%11.69%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
18.62%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DHS and FDL is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006

0.93

The correlation between DHS and FDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DHS vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DHS
FDL

Financial Services

23.2%
13.7%

Healthcare

15.9%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

14.2%
24.3%

Utilities

8.9%
15.4%

Energy

8.2%
11.1%

Communication Services

8.2%
11.2%

Technology

7.4%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
4.4%

Industrials

4.5%
3.6%

Real Estate

3.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%
0.4%

Financial Services

DHS
23.2%
FDL
13.7%

Healthcare

DHS
15.9%
FDL
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

DHS
14.2%
FDL
24.3%

Utilities

DHS
8.9%
FDL
15.4%

Energy

DHS
8.2%
FDL
11.1%

Communication Services

DHS
8.2%
FDL
11.2%

Technology

DHS
7.4%
FDL
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DHS
5.4%
FDL
4.4%

Industrials

DHS
4.5%
FDL
3.6%

Real Estate

DHS
3.0%
FDL

-

Basic Materials

DHS
1.1%
FDL
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHS vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DHS vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHSFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

6.62

-2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.00

15.62

-0.61

DHS vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHS Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHS and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHS vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHS drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, roughly equal to the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHSFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.25%

-65.93%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.30%

-4.27%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.87%

-12.24%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.28%

-16.46%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.35%

-41.40%

+4.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-1.58%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-9.59%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.81%

-0.10%

Volatility

DHS vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) is 3.77%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that DHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHSFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

4.65%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

8.75%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

11.89%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

14.44%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

17.16%

-1.06%

DHS vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHS vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

DHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than FDL's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.18%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.58%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHS and FDL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to DHS (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHS dropped -67.25% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, FDL leads with 11.08% vs 9.67% for DHS. On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDL has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 3.18% for DHS.

DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DHS and 0.43% for FDL.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHS and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer