DHS vs. ACWX
DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) and ACWX (iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index, while ACWX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DHS returned 9.75%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for ACWX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DHS charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWX.
Performance
DHS vs. ACWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DHS having a 12.81% return and ACWX slightly higher at 13.42%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DHS having a 9.75% annualized return and ACWX not far ahead at 9.87%.
DHS
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 12.76%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
ACWX
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
DHS vs. ACWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 12.81% | 12.87% | 18.02% | -0.19% | 7.97% | 23.20% | -5.70% | 22.59% | -7.41% | 11.69% |
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 13.42% | 32.59% | 5.17% | 15.63% | -16.07% | 7.67% | 10.29% | 21.05% | -13.99% | 27.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHS and ACWX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DHS and ACWX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DHS vs. ACWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DHS
ACWX
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
DHS
ACWX
Consumer Defensive
DHS
ACWX
Healthcare
DHS
ACWX
Energy
DHS
ACWX
Communication Services
DHS
ACWX
Utilities
DHS
ACWX
Consumer Cyclical
DHS
ACWX
Industrials
DHS
ACWX
Technology
DHS
ACWX
Real Estate
DHS
ACWX
Basic Materials
DHS
ACWX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHS vs. ACWX — Risk / Return Rank
DHS
ACWX
DHS vs. ACWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHS | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.32 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 2.53 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.09 | 9.69 | +3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHS vs. ACWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHS drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than ACWX's maximum drawdown of -60.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS and ACWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHS | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.25% | -60.40% | -6.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.30% | -11.42% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.87% | -13.84% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.28% | -30.07% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.35% | -35.38% | -1.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -1.82% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.54% | -13.32% | +3.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 2.98% | -1.26% |
Volatility
DHS vs. ACWX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) is 3.07%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that DHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHS | ACWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 7.03% | -3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.35% | 14.36% | -7.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.02% | 16.43% | -6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 16.46% | -2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 17.43% | -1.35% |
DHS vs. ACWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHS vs. ACWX - Dividend Comparison
DHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than ACWX's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.49% | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 2.68% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 2.40% | 2.77% | 2.51% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHS and ACWX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWX has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to DHS (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHS dropped -67.25% vs ACWX's -60.40%.
On 10-year performance, ACWX leads with 9.87% vs 9.75% for DHS. On fees, ACWX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ACWX has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 9.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACWX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DHS.
DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 2.49% for ACWX.
DHS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while ACWX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index, while ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DHS and 0.32% for ACWX.
DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DHS and ACWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer