PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGT vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGT vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGT achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 10.98% return. Over the past 10 years, DGT has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 14.09%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.


DGT

1D
-0.58%
1M
5.01%
YTD
12.72%
6M
14.40%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
13.59%
10Y*
14.09%

SPYM

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.98%
6M
10.98%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGT vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGT
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF
12.72%30.04%14.15%20.95%-8.00%21.50%9.67%22.19%-9.65%24.87%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.98%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DGT and SPYM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.75

The correlation between DGT and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGT vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGT
SPYM

Technology

17.7%
38.5%

Financial Services

17.1%
11.1%

Industrials

13.9%
7.6%

Healthcare

10.9%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
9.9%

Energy

7.1%
3.2%

Basic Materials

7.1%
1.7%

Communication Services

6.0%
10.6%

Utilities

3.8%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.8%

Technology

DGT
17.7%
SPYM
38.5%

Financial Services

DGT
17.1%
SPYM
11.1%

Industrials

DGT
13.9%
SPYM
7.6%

Healthcare

DGT
10.9%
SPYM
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

DGT
7.6%
SPYM
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DGT
7.5%
SPYM
9.9%

Energy

DGT
7.1%
SPYM
3.2%

Basic Materials

DGT
7.1%
SPYM
1.7%

Communication Services

DGT
6.0%
SPYM
10.6%

Utilities

DGT
3.8%
SPYM
2.5%

Real Estate

DGT
1.4%
SPYM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGT vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGT
DGT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGT vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGTSPYMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

2.39

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.58

3.27

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.44

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.17

+0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.02

14.76

+0.27

DGT vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGT and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGTSPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.39

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.83

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.87

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.62

-0.32

Drawdowns

DGT vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGT drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGT and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGTSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.36%

-54.46%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.38%

-8.90%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

-18.72%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

-24.48%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.40%

-33.87%

-0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.66%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.83%

-7.15%

-6.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.91%

+0.15%

Volatility

DGT vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.83%. This indicates that DGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGTSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

2.83%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.54%

8.90%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

11.80%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

16.80%

-1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

18.00%

-1.05%

DGT vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGT vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than SPYM's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGT
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF
2.52%2.78%2.83%2.53%3.15%2.66%1.97%2.76%2.50%1.93%2.31%2.37%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGT and SPYM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGT has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGT dropped -55.36% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.62% vs 14.09% for DGT. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 14.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DGT.

DGT has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 1.00% for SPYM.

DGT is categorized as Global Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. DGT tracks The Global Dow, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DGT and 0.02% for SPYM.

DGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGT and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer