DGT vs. SPGM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DGT (State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF) and SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) are both Global Equities funds from State Street - DGT tracks the The Global Dow while SPGM tracks the MSCI AC World IMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGT returned 14.09%/yr vs 12.95%/yr for SPGM. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DGT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPGM.

Performance

DGT vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DGT having a 12.72% return and SPGM slightly higher at 12.88%. Over the past 10 years, DGT has outperformed SPGM with an annualized return of 14.09%, while SPGM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.95% annualized return.

DGT

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 5.01%
• YTD: 12.72%
• 6M: 14.40%
• 1Y: 30.90%
• 3Y*: 22.91%
• 5Y*: 13.59%
• 10Y*: 14.09%

SPGM

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 4.94%
• YTD: 12.88%
• 6M: 13.62%
• 1Y: 31.70%
• 3Y*: 21.46%
• 5Y*: 11.48%
• 10Y*: 12.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGT vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF	12.72%	30.04%	14.15%	20.95%	-8.00%	21.50%	9.67%	22.19%	-9.65%	24.87%
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	12.88%	23.62%	16.75%	21.34%	-17.53%	21.13%	15.28%	26.58%	-10.12%	23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DGT and SPGM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2012	0.78

The correlation between DGT and SPGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DGT vs. SPGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DGT	SPGM
Technology	17.7%	27.4%
Financial Services	17.1%	16.4%
Industrials	13.9%	13.1%
Healthcare	10.9%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	4.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	9.2%
Energy	7.1%	4.5%
Basic Materials	7.1%	3.9%
Communication Services	6.0%	8.5%
Utilities	3.8%	2.2%
Real Estate	1.4%	1.9%

Return for Risk

DGT vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGT

DGT Risk / Return Rank: 77
DGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
DGT Omega Ratio Rank: 79
DGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
DGT Martin Ratio Rank: 77

SPGM

SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 73
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 74
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGT vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DGT	SPGM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	2.47	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	3.39	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.45	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.70	3.35	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.02	15.14	-0.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DGT vs. SPGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the SPGM Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGT and SPGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DGT	SPGM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	2.47	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	0.72	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.74	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.66	-0.36

Drawdowns

DGT vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGT drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, which is greater than SPGM's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGT and SPGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGT	SPGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.36%	-33.97%	-21.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.38%	-9.50%	+1.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.67%	-16.90%	+2.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.18%	-25.93%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.40%	-33.97%	-0.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-0.87%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.83%	-4.81%	-9.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	2.10%	-0.04%

Volatility

DGT vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) have volatilities of 3.94% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGT	SPGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.94%	3.92%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.54%	10.35%	-0.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.98%	12.88%	-0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.16%	16.03%	-0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	17.57%	-0.62%

DGT vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGT vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison

DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than SPGM's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF	2.52%	2.78%	2.83%	2.53%	3.15%	2.66%	1.97%	2.76%	2.50%	1.93%	2.31%	2.37%
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	1.79%	1.89%	1.98%	2.09%	2.37%	1.94%	1.45%	2.46%	1.89%	2.29%	1.87%	3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGT and SPGM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, DGT and SPGM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DGT or SPGM?

DGT has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to SPGM (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGT dropped -55.36% vs SPGM's -33.97%.

Which ETF is better, DGT or SPGM?

On 10-year performance, DGT leads with 14.09% vs 12.95% for SPGM. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DGT or SPGM?

Over the 10-year period, DGT has performed better with a 14.09% return vs 12.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGT or SPGM?

SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DGT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DGT or SPGM?

DGT has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 1.79% for SPGM.

What is the main difference between DGT and SPGM?

DGT tracks The Global Dow, while SPGM tracks MSCI AC World IMI. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DGT and 0.09% for SPGM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.