DGT vs. SCHF
DGT (State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGT is a Global Equities fund tracking the The Global Dow, while SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGT returned 14.09%/yr vs 10.27%/yr for SCHF. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
DGT vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGT achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 15.56% return. Over the past 10 years, DGT has outperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 14.09%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively lower 10.27% annualized return.
DGT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 30.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
SCHF
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 18.62%
- 1Y
- 32.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
DGT vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 12.72% | 30.04% | 14.15% | 20.95% | -8.00% | 21.50% | 9.67% | 22.19% | -9.65% | 24.87% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 15.56% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGT and SCHF is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009 | 0.88 |
The correlation between DGT and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
DGT vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DGT
SCHF
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DGT
SCHF
Financial Services
DGT
SCHF
Industrials
DGT
SCHF
Healthcare
DGT
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
DGT
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
DGT
SCHF
Energy
DGT
SCHF
Basic Materials
DGT
SCHF
Communication Services
DGT
SCHF
Utilities
DGT
SCHF
Real Estate
DGT
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGT vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
DGT
SCHF
DGT vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGT | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.37 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 2.86 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | 11.11 | +3.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGT | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 2.09 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.60 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.60 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.44 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
DGT vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGT drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGT and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGT | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.36% | -34.87% | -20.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -11.48% | +3.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.67% | -13.41% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.18% | -29.14% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.40% | -34.87% | +0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.86% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.83% | -7.38% | -6.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 2.95% | -0.89% |
Volatility
DGT vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) is 3.94%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that DGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGT | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 5.66% | -1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.54% | 13.34% | -3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 15.74% | -3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 16.39% | -1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 17.18% | -0.23% |
DGT vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGT vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than SCHF's 2.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF | 2.52% | 2.78% | 2.83% | 2.53% | 3.15% | 2.66% | 1.97% | 2.76% | 2.50% | 1.93% | 2.31% | 2.37% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.96% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, DGT and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHF has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to DGT (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGT dropped -55.36% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 10-year performance, DGT leads with 14.09% vs 10.27% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, DGT has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGT has performed better with a 14.09% return vs 10.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DGT.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 2.52% for DGT.
DGT is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DGT tracks The Global Dow, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DGT and 0.06% for SCHF.
DGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGT and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer