DGT vs. INKM

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

DGT (State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF) and INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) are both Global Equities funds from State Street. DGT is passively managed, while INKM is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, DGT returned 13.73%/yr vs 5.35%/yr for INKM. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

DGT vs. INKM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGT achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly higher than INKM's 6.46% return. Over the past 10 years, DGT has outperformed INKM with an annualized return of 13.73%, while INKM has yielded a comparatively lower 5.35% annualized return.

DGT

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -1.02%
• 6M: 9.23%
• YTD: 11.87%
• 1Y: 25.40%
• 3Y*: 20.47%
• 5Y*: 14.03%
• 10Y*: 13.73%

INKM

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.16%
• 6M: 5.00%
• YTD: 6.46%
• 1Y: 11.65%
• 3Y*: 9.30%
• 5Y*: 4.23%
• 10Y*: 5.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGT vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF	11.87%	30.04%	14.15%	20.95%	-8.00%	21.50%	9.67%	22.19%	-9.65%	24.87%
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	6.46%	11.86%	5.70%	10.26%	-12.58%	8.52%	3.11%	17.12%	-5.32%	13.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DGT and INKM is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012	0.75

The correlation between DGT and INKM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DGT vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGT

DGT Risk / Return Rank: 79
DGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DGT Omega Ratio Rank: 81
DGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
DGT Martin Ratio Rank: 80

INKM

INKM Risk / Return Rank: 74
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 78
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGT vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGT	INKM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	1.94	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	2.76	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.36	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	2.57	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.03	10.11	+1.92

DGT vs. INKM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the INKM Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGT and INKM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DGT vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGT drawdown since its inception was -55.36%, which is greater than INKM's maximum drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGT and INKM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGT	INKM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.36%	-28.58%	-26.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.38%	-4.55%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.67%	-9.25%	-5.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.18%	-19.18%	-6.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.40%	-28.58%	-5.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-0.18%	-1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.78%	-3.67%	-10.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	1.16%	+0.96%

Volatility

DGT vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) at 1.61%. This indicates that DGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INKM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGT	INKM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	1.61%	+2.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.36%	4.78%	+5.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	6.04%	+6.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.20%	8.31%	+6.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.78%	9.75%	+7.03%

DGT vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DGT and INKM have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

DGT vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison

DGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than INKM's 4.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGT State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF	2.51%	2.78%	2.83%	2.53%	3.15%	2.66%	1.97%	2.76%	2.50%	1.93%	2.31%	2.37%
INKM SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF	4.78%	5.82%	4.83%	4.56%	5.03%	3.74%	3.88%	4.38%	4.08%	3.10%	3.39%	3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGT and INKM in my portfolio?

DGT and INKM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DGT or INKM?

DGT has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to INKM (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGT dropped -55.36% vs INKM's -28.58%.

Which ETF is better, DGT or INKM?

On 10-year performance, DGT leads with 13.73% vs 5.35% for INKM. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, INKM has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DGT or INKM?

Over the 10-year period, DGT has performed better with a 13.73% return vs 5.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGT or INKM?

DGT and INKM have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DGT or INKM?

INKM has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 2.51% for DGT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.