PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGS vs. FMQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGS vs. FMQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGS achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly higher than FMQQ's -11.66% return.


DGS

1D
-2.18%
1M
-2.19%
6M
9.13%
YTD
12.42%
1Y
18.22%
3Y*
13.40%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*
8.81%

FMQQ

1D
-0.93%
1M
8.36%
6M
-11.51%
YTD
-11.66%
1Y
-16.17%
3Y*
3.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGS vs. FMQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
12.42%21.18%1.13%19.08%-12.35%-0.73%
FMQQ
FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF
-11.66%10.77%12.45%15.15%-54.03%-16.57%

Correlation

The correlation between DGS and FMQQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021

0.67

The correlation between DGS and FMQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGS vs. FMQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGS
DGS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FMQQ
FMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGS vs. FMQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) and FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGSFMQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.87

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

-0.53

+2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.88

-0.94

+6.83

DGS vs. FMQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the FMQQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGS and FMQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGS vs. FMQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGS drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, roughly equal to the maximum FMQQ drawdown of -64.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGS and FMQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGSFMQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.83%

-64.51%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-30.82%

+20.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.31%

-30.82%

+11.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-52.24%

+48.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.53%

-49.45%

+36.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

17.17%

-14.07%

Volatility

DGS vs. FMQQ - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) at 4.92%. This indicates that DGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGSFMQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

4.92%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.24%

16.29%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.12%

19.25%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

24.72%

-9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

24.72%

-7.40%

DGS vs. FMQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than FMQQ's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGS vs. FMQQ - Dividend Comparison

DGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than FMQQ's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.81%3.45%3.36%4.55%5.34%3.98%3.69%3.95%4.24%2.81%3.42%3.28%
FMQQ
FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF
0.69%0.61%0.45%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGS and FMQQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGS has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to FMQQ (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGS dropped -61.83% vs FMQQ's -64.51%.

On 3-year performance, DGS leads with 13.40% vs 3.23% for FMQQ. On fees, DGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DGS has performed better with a 13.40% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FMQQ.

DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.69% for FMQQ.

DGS tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index, while FMQQ tracks FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and EMQQ. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DGS and 0.86% for FMQQ.

DGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGS and FMQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer