PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRW vs. GRNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRW vs. GRNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRW achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than GRNY's 12.12% return.


DGRW

1D
0.71%
1M
4.18%
YTD
9.87%
6M
9.49%
1Y
21.83%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
14.19%

GRNY

1D
0.87%
1M
3.78%
YTD
12.12%
6M
10.16%
1Y
30.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRW vs. GRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
9.87%12.17%-4.72%
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF
12.12%24.05%-1.09%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRW and GRNY is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024

0.76

The correlation between DGRW and GRNY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRW vs. GRNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

GRNY
GRNY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRW vs. GRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGRWGRNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.30

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.67

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

8.16

+3.41

DGRW vs. GRNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRW Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the GRNY Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRW and GRNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGRWGRNYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.77

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.98

-0.12

Drawdowns

DGRW vs. GRNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRW drawdown since its inception was -32.04%, which is greater than GRNY's maximum drawdown of -24.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRW and GRNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRWGRNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.04%

-24.18%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-11.63%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-4.02%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

3.80%

-1.91%

Volatility

DGRW vs. GRNY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) is 2.49%, while Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that DGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRWGRNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

4.28%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.67%

12.71%

-5.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.89%

17.58%

-7.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

23.17%

-9.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

23.17%

-6.96%

DGRW vs. GRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNY's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRW vs. GRNY - Dividend Comparison

DGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while GRNY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.26%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRW and GRNY have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRNY has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to DGRW (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRW dropped -32.04% vs GRNY's -24.18%.

On 1-year performance, GRNY leads with 30.94% vs 21.83% for DGRW. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 2.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GRNY has performed better with a 30.94% return vs 21.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNY.

DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for GRNY.

DGRW is categorized as Dividend, while GRNY is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Tidal ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DGRW and 0.75% for GRNY.

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRW and GRNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer