PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRS vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRS vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRS achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 16.40% return.


DGRS

1D
0.95%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
14.63%
6M
14.01%
1Y
26.83%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
9.61%

USVM

1D
0.99%
1M
1.96%
YTD
16.40%
6M
16.14%
1Y
32.38%
3Y*
20.65%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRS vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
14.63%-0.43%10.40%21.16%-13.11%23.11%7.86%24.20%-10.75%3.19%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
16.40%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRS and USVM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.91

The correlation between DGRS and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRS vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRS
USVM

Financial Services

24.8%
22.0%

Industrials

19.0%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

16.5%
11.1%

Energy

12.0%
4.4%

Technology

8.7%
11.6%

Basic Materials

7.6%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
5.0%

Communication Services

2.0%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.7%
11.9%

Healthcare

1.3%
11.0%

Utilities

0.2%
6.4%

Financial Services

DGRS
24.8%
USVM
22.0%

Industrials

DGRS
19.0%
USVM
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRS
16.5%
USVM
11.1%

Energy

DGRS
12.0%
USVM
4.4%

Technology

DGRS
8.7%
USVM
11.6%

Basic Materials

DGRS
7.6%
USVM
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

DGRS
6.3%
USVM
5.0%

Communication Services

DGRS
2.0%
USVM
2.8%

Real Estate

DGRS
1.7%
USVM
11.9%

Healthcare

DGRS
1.3%
USVM
11.0%

Utilities

DGRS
0.2%
USVM
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRS vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRS
DGRS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DGRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRS Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRS vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGRSUSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.38

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

3.89

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

14.65

-6.12

DGRS vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRS and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGRSUSVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.18

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.51

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.49

-0.08

Drawdowns

DGRS vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRS drawdown since its inception was -44.83%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRS and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRSUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.83%

-42.38%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-8.36%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-24.34%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-25.27%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

0.00%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-7.90%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.22%

+0.93%

Volatility

DGRS vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) have volatilities of 4.28% and 4.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRSUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

4.32%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.39%

10.76%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.98%

14.93%

+3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

19.65%

+0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

22.01%

+1.62%

DGRS vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRS vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

DGRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than USVM's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
2.21%2.68%2.15%2.36%2.88%2.19%2.32%2.39%2.64%1.90%1.82%2.55%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.74%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DGRS and USVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USVM has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to DGRS (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRS dropped -44.83% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.96% vs 6.09% for DGRS. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.96% return vs 6.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DGRS.

DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 1.74% for USVM.

DGRS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USVM is Momentum. DGRS tracks WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DGRS and 0.29% for USVM.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRS and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer