PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRO vs. IVW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRO vs. IVW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than IVW's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has underperformed IVW with an annualized return of 13.33%, while IVW has yielded a comparatively higher 18.03% annualized return.


DGRO

1D
-0.23%
1M
1.34%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.87%
1Y
22.71%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
13.33%

IVW

1D
1.68%
1M
1.07%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.58%
1Y
32.41%
3Y*
26.28%
5Y*
15.23%
10Y*
18.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRO vs. IVW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
12.13%21.95%35.82%29.83%-29.50%31.80%33.19%30.77%-0.21%27.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and IVW is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between DGRO and IVW has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DGRO vs. IVW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRO
IVW

Technology

22.0%
53.0%

Financial Services

20.6%
8.6%

Healthcare

16.5%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

11.1%
1.0%

Industrials

10.4%
5.3%

Utilities

6.4%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
8.4%

Energy

5.1%
0.1%

Basic Materials

2.4%
0.3%

Communication Services

0.1%
15.8%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Technology

DGRO
22.0%
IVW
53.0%

Financial Services

DGRO
20.6%
IVW
8.6%

Healthcare

DGRO
16.5%
IVW
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

DGRO
11.1%
IVW
1.0%

Industrials

DGRO
10.4%
IVW
5.3%

Utilities

DGRO
6.4%
IVW
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRO
5.4%
IVW
8.4%

Energy

DGRO
5.1%
IVW
0.1%

Basic Materials

DGRO
2.4%
IVW
0.3%

Communication Services

DGRO
0.1%
IVW
15.8%

Real Estate

DGRO

-

IVW
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRO vs. IVW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IVW
IVW Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVW Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVW Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. IVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGROIVWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.33

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

2.31

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.65

9.21

+4.44

DGRO vs. IVW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the IVW Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and IVW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. IVW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum IVW drawdown of -57.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and IVW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGROIVWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-57.33%

+22.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-13.75%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-22.15%

+8.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-32.72%

+13.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

-32.72%

-2.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-2.47%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.43%

-17.59%

+14.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

3.44%

-1.77%

Volatility

DGRO vs. IVW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.67%, while iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGROIVWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

6.91%

-4.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.94%

13.76%

-6.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.53%

16.88%

-7.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.81%

21.32%

-7.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

20.70%

-4.07%

DGRO vs. IVW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IVW's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DGRO vs. IVW - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than IVW's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.97%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.36%0.40%0.43%1.03%0.92%0.46%0.82%1.63%1.28%1.30%1.51%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRO and IVW have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVW has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to DGRO (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs IVW's -57.33%.

On 10-year performance, IVW leads with 18.03% vs 13.33% for DGRO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVW has performed better with a 18.03% return vs 13.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IVW.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.36% for IVW.

DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while IVW tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.18% for IVW.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRO and IVW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer