PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRO vs. FDLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRO vs. FDLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly higher than FDLO's 3.88% return.


DGRO

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.67%
YTD
8.47%
6M
9.27%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
13.26%

FDLO

1D
-0.68%
1M
0.03%
YTD
3.88%
6M
3.86%
1Y
13.32%
3Y*
13.93%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRO vs. FDLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.47%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
3.88%11.77%16.06%16.38%-10.38%24.00%12.19%31.10%-0.26%20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and FDLO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.90

The correlation between DGRO and FDLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRO vs. FDLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRO
FDLO

Financial Services

21.2%
12.1%

Technology

19.4%
33.8%

Healthcare

16.4%
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

11.5%
4.7%

Industrials

10.8%
9.2%

Utilities

6.9%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
10.1%

Energy

5.6%
3.2%

Basic Materials

2.5%
1.7%

Communication Services

0.1%
10.8%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Financial Services

DGRO
21.2%
FDLO
12.1%

Technology

DGRO
19.4%
FDLO
33.8%

Healthcare

DGRO
16.4%
FDLO
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

DGRO
11.5%
FDLO
4.7%

Industrials

DGRO
10.8%
FDLO
9.2%

Utilities

DGRO
6.9%
FDLO
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRO
5.7%
FDLO
10.1%

Energy

DGRO
5.6%
FDLO
3.2%

Basic Materials

DGRO
2.5%
FDLO
1.7%

Communication Services

DGRO
0.1%
FDLO
10.8%

Real Estate

DGRO

-

FDLO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRO vs. FDLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. FDLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGROFDLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.27

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

1.87

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.12

8.13

+4.99

DGRO vs. FDLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the FDLO Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and FDLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGROFDLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

1.52

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.76

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.82

-0.06

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. FDLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, roughly equal to the maximum FDLO drawdown of -34.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and FDLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGROFDLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-34.35%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-7.13%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-13.68%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-19.23%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-1.97%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-3.38%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.64%

+0.03%

Volatility

DGRO vs. FDLO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a higher volatility of 2.32% compared to Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) at 2.17%. This indicates that DGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGROFDLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

2.17%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

6.50%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.52%

8.80%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

13.07%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

15.50%

+1.13%

DGRO vs. FDLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FDLO's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRO vs. FDLO - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than FDLO's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.38%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRO and FDLO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRO has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to FDLO (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs FDLO's -34.35%.

On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 10.64% vs 9.84% for FDLO. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 10.64% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDLO.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.38% for FDLO.

DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FDLO is Volatility Hedged Equity. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.29% for FDLO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRO and FDLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer