PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRO vs. EFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRO vs. EFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 9.86% return, which is significantly higher than EFA's 9.36% return. Over the past 10 years, DGRO has outperformed EFA with an annualized return of 13.52%, while EFA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.84% annualized return.


DGRO

1D
0.69%
1M
2.86%
YTD
9.86%
6M
9.27%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
16.74%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
13.52%

EFA

1D
0.28%
1M
1.51%
YTD
9.36%
6M
10.80%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
9.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRO vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.86%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
9.36%31.55%3.49%18.36%-14.39%11.45%7.60%22.04%-13.82%25.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and EFA is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.76

The correlation between DGRO and EFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRO vs. EFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRO
EFA

Technology

22.0%
12.1%

Financial Services

20.6%
24.1%

Healthcare

16.5%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

11.1%
6.7%

Industrials

10.4%
18.9%

Utilities

6.4%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
7.4%

Energy

5.1%
3.8%

Basic Materials

2.4%
6.2%

Communication Services

0.1%
4.6%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Technology

DGRO
22.0%
EFA
12.1%

Financial Services

DGRO
20.6%
EFA
24.1%

Healthcare

DGRO
16.5%
EFA
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

DGRO
11.1%
EFA
6.7%

Industrials

DGRO
10.4%
EFA
18.9%

Utilities

DGRO
6.4%
EFA
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRO
5.4%
EFA
7.4%

Energy

DGRO
5.1%
EFA
3.8%

Basic Materials

DGRO
2.4%
EFA
6.2%

Communication Services

DGRO
0.1%
EFA
4.6%

Real Estate

DGRO

-

EFA
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRO vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

EFA
EFA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGROEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.24

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

1.79

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.36

6.67

+6.69

DGRO vs. EFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the EFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and EFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, smaller than the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and EFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGROEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-61.04%

+25.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-11.42%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-14.05%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-29.53%

+10.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

-34.19%

-0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.61%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-11.92%

+8.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

3.07%

-1.39%

Volatility

DGRO vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.64%, while iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGROEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

5.50%

-2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

13.19%

-6.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.59%

15.64%

-6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

16.58%

-2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

17.27%

-0.65%

DGRO vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRO vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than EFA's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.94%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
3.09%3.38%3.24%2.98%2.69%3.33%2.13%3.10%3.39%2.57%3.07%2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRO and EFA have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFA has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to DGRO (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs EFA's -61.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.52% vs 9.84% for EFA. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for EFA.

EFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 1.94% for DGRO.

DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while EFA tracks MSCI EAFE Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.32% for EFA.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRO and EFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer