PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRO vs. BBJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRO vs. BBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRO achieves a 13.15% return, which is significantly higher than BBJP's 11.90% return.


DGRO

1D
0.83%
1M
3.14%
6M
10.33%
YTD
13.15%
1Y
20.83%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
13.29%
ALL TIME*
12.47%

BBJP

1D
0.19%
1M
-2.16%
6M
6.85%
YTD
11.90%
1Y
24.42%
3Y*
16.52%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$122.93M$111.87M$115.37M
$96.40M$101.84M$109.07M

DGRO vs. BBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
13.15%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-4.48%
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
11.90%26.55%7.47%20.65%-17.24%1.21%15.42%18.85%-13.92%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRO and BBJP is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018

0.62

The correlation between DGRO and BBJP shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DGRO vs. BBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRO
BBJP

Financial Services

20.4%
18.8%

Healthcare

17.9%
5.8%

Technology

17.3%
22.2%

Consumer Defensive

11.9%
3.6%

Industrials

11.3%
25.6%

Utilities

7.3%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
10.7%

Energy

4.8%
0.9%

Basic Materials

2.5%
4.1%

Communication Services

0.1%
4.6%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Financial Services

DGRO
20.4%
BBJP
18.8%

Healthcare

DGRO
17.9%
BBJP
5.8%

Technology

DGRO
17.3%
BBJP
22.2%

Consumer Defensive

DGRO
11.9%
BBJP
3.6%

Industrials

DGRO
11.3%
BBJP
25.6%

Utilities

DGRO
7.3%
BBJP
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRO
6.5%
BBJP
10.7%

Energy

DGRO
4.8%
BBJP
0.9%

Basic Materials

DGRO
2.5%
BBJP
4.1%

Communication Services

DGRO
0.1%
BBJP
4.6%

Real Estate

DGRO

-

BBJP
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRO vs. BBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BBJP
BBJP Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRO vs. BBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGROBBJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.22

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

1.70

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

5.53

+7.19

DGRO vs. BBJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the BBJP Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRO and BBJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGRO vs. BBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRO drawdown since its inception was -35.10%, which is greater than BBJP's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRO and BBJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGROBBJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.10%

-32.66%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-13.60%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

-14.49%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

-32.66%

+13.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.62%

+5.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-8.43%

+5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

4.19%

-2.51%

Volatility

DGRO vs. BBJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is 2.81%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that DGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGROBBJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

5.94%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

16.84%

-9.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.52%

20.22%

-10.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.78%

18.45%

-4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

18.41%

-1.84%

DGRO vs. BBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BBJP's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DGRO vs. BBJP - Dividend Comparison

DGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than BBJP's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
4.80%5.37%2.80%3.05%1.52%2.89%1.12%2.31%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.90%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRO and BBJP have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBJP has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to DGRO (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRO dropped -35.10% vs BBJP's -32.66%.

On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 11.10% vs 8.67% for BBJP. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 11.10% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBJP.

BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 1.90% for DGRO.

DGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BBJP is Japan Equities. DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, while BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for DGRO and 0.19% for BBJP.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRO and BBJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer