BBJP vs. EWJ
BBJP (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF) and EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - BBJP tracks the Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index while EWJ tracks the MSCI Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBJP returned 9.11%/yr vs 8.95%/yr for EWJ. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BBJP charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWJ.
Performance
BBJP vs. EWJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBJP achieves a 14.97% return, which is significantly lower than EWJ's 15.90% return.
BBJP
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 14.97%
- 6M
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 29.99%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- —
EWJ
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 5.98%
- YTD
- 15.90%
- 6M
- 17.72%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 18.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
BBJP vs. EWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 14.97% | 26.55% | 7.47% | 20.65% | -17.24% | 1.21% | 15.42% | 18.85% | -13.92% |
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 15.90% | 25.84% | 7.03% | 20.29% | -17.72% | 1.16% | 15.40% | 19.34% | -14.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBJP and EWJ is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.99 |
The correlation between BBJP and EWJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBJP vs. EWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBJP
EWJ
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
BBJP
EWJ
Technology
BBJP
EWJ
Financial Services
BBJP
EWJ
Consumer Cyclical
BBJP
EWJ
Communication Services
BBJP
EWJ
Healthcare
BBJP
EWJ
Consumer Defensive
BBJP
EWJ
Basic Materials
BBJP
EWJ
Real Estate
BBJP
EWJ
Utilities
BBJP
EWJ
Energy
BBJP
EWJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBJP vs. EWJ — Risk / Return Rank
BBJP
EWJ
BBJP vs. EWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBJP | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | 1.56 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.27 | 2.29 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 2.36 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.76 | 7.94 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBJP | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 1.56 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.49 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.11 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
BBJP vs. EWJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBJP drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum EWJ drawdown of -60.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBJP and EWJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBJP | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.66% | -60.93% | +28.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.60% | -13.59% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.49% | -14.68% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.66% | -33.14% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -0.42% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.53% | -21.74% | +13.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 4.03% | +0.04% |
Volatility
BBJP vs. EWJ - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) have volatilities of 4.29% and 4.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBJP | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 4.36% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.99% | 15.03% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.47% | 19.56% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.15% | 18.23% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 17.28% | +1.01% |
BBJP vs. EWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBJP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EWJ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBJP vs. EWJ - Dividend Comparison
BBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than EWJ's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 4.67% | 5.37% | 2.80% | 3.05% | 1.52% | 2.89% | 1.12% | 2.31% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 3.90% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.03% | 1.23% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.25% | 1.95% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, BBJP and EWJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EWJ has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to BBJP (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBJP dropped -32.66% vs EWJ's -60.93%.
On 5-year performance, BBJP leads with 9.11% vs 8.95% for EWJ. On fees, BBJP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBJP has performed better with a 9.11% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBJP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWJ.
BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 3.90% for EWJ.
BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBJP and 0.49% for EWJ.
EWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBJP and EWJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer