PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBJP vs. DBJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBJP vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBJP achieves a 14.97% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 19.54% return.


BBJP

1D
0.57%
1M
5.50%
YTD
14.97%
6M
16.98%
1Y
29.99%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*

DBJP

1D
0.30%
1M
7.65%
YTD
19.54%
6M
22.66%
1Y
50.91%
3Y*
28.70%
5Y*
21.36%
10Y*
16.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBJP vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
14.97%26.55%7.47%20.65%-17.24%1.21%15.42%18.85%-13.92%
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
19.54%29.51%25.53%36.21%-4.19%13.04%10.53%20.87%-13.86%

Correlation

The correlation between BBJP and DBJP is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.86

The correlation between BBJP and DBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBJP vs. DBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBJP
DBJP

Industrials

26.7%
26.0%

Technology

17.8%
19.1%

Financial Services

17.1%
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.6%
12.2%

Communication Services

7.7%
7.9%

Healthcare

6.1%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.6%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.7%
2.3%

Utilities

1.3%
1.1%

Energy

1.0%
1.1%

Industrials

BBJP
26.7%
DBJP
26.0%

Technology

BBJP
17.8%
DBJP
19.1%

Financial Services

BBJP
17.1%
DBJP
17.5%

Consumer Cyclical

BBJP
12.6%
DBJP
12.2%

Communication Services

BBJP
7.7%
DBJP
7.9%

Healthcare

BBJP
6.1%
DBJP
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

BBJP
3.7%
DBJP
3.6%

Basic Materials

BBJP
3.2%
DBJP
3.0%

Real Estate

BBJP
2.7%
DBJP
2.3%

Utilities

BBJP
1.3%
DBJP
1.1%

Energy

BBJP
1.0%
DBJP
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBJP vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBJP
BBJP Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DBJP
DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBJP vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBJPDBJPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

2.74

-1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.27

3.79

-1.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.49

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

4.92

-2.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.76

19.19

-11.43

BBJP vs. DBJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the DBJP Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBJP and DBJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBJPDBJPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.74

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

1.13

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.68

-0.23

Drawdowns

BBJP vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBJP drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, roughly equal to the maximum DBJP drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBJP and DBJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBJPDBJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-31.30%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.60%

-10.39%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.49%

-21.50%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-21.50%

-11.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

0.00%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.53%

-7.29%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

2.66%

+1.41%

Volatility

BBJP vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) at 3.89%. This indicates that BBJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBJPDBJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

3.89%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.99%

13.85%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.47%

18.68%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.15%

18.93%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

19.46%

-1.17%

BBJP vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBJP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBJP vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison

BBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than DBJP's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
4.67%5.37%2.80%3.05%1.52%2.89%1.12%2.31%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBJP
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF
2.35%2.81%2.80%5.21%0.80%2.30%2.53%2.56%3.87%2.07%1.13%5.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBJP and DBJP have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBJP has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to DBJP (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBJP dropped -32.66% vs DBJP's -31.30%.

On 5-year performance, DBJP leads with 21.36% vs 9.11% for BBJP. On fees, BBJP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DBJP has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 21.36% return vs 9.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBJP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.

BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 2.35% for DBJP.

BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBJP and 0.45% for DBJP.

DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBJP and DBJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer