BBJP vs. BBAX
BBJP (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF) and BBAX (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while BBAX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBJP returned 8.92%/yr vs 5.02%/yr for BBAX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.
Performance
BBJP vs. BBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBJP achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than BBAX's 10.52% return.
BBJP
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 15.37%
- 6M
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 32.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
BBAX
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 10.52%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- —
BBJP vs. BBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 15.37% | 26.55% | 7.47% | 20.65% | -17.24% | 1.21% | 15.42% | 18.85% | -12.29% |
BBAX JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF | 10.52% | 20.21% | 2.50% | 5.60% | -4.80% | 5.53% | 8.02% | 18.66% | -9.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBJP and BBAX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between BBJP and BBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBJP vs. BBAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBJP
BBAX
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
BBJP
BBAX
Technology
BBJP
BBAX
Financial Services
BBJP
BBAX
Consumer Cyclical
BBJP
BBAX
Communication Services
BBJP
BBAX
Healthcare
BBJP
BBAX
Consumer Defensive
BBJP
BBAX
Basic Materials
BBJP
BBAX
Real Estate
BBJP
BBAX
Utilities
BBJP
BBAX
Energy
BBJP
BBAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBJP vs. BBAX — Risk / Return Rank
BBJP
BBAX
BBJP vs. BBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBJP | BBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.25 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 2.25 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 7.46 | +0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBJP | BBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.41 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.29 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.35 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
BBJP vs. BBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBJP drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum BBAX drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBJP and BBAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBJP | BBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.66% | -39.64% | +6.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.60% | -9.01% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.49% | -20.12% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.66% | -24.33% | -8.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -3.16% | +2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.53% | -7.22% | -1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 2.71% | +1.33% |
Volatility
BBJP vs. BBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) is 4.26%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that BBJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBJP | BBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 4.65% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.98% | 11.79% | +3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.44% | 14.34% | +5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.15% | 17.28% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 19.68% | -1.39% |
BBJP vs. BBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BBJP and BBAX have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBJP vs. BBAX - Dividend Comparison
BBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than BBAX's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBAX JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF | 3.58% | 3.86% | 4.13% | 4.17% | 5.06% | 5.47% | 2.57% | 4.07% | 1.36% |
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 4.65% | 5.37% | 2.80% | 3.05% | 1.52% | 2.89% | 1.12% | 2.31% | 0.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBJP and BBAX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBAX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to BBJP (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBJP dropped -32.66% vs BBAX's -39.64%.
On 5-year performance, BBJP leads with 8.92% vs 5.02% for BBAX. Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. On volatility, BBJP has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBJP has performed better with a 8.92% return vs 5.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBJP and BBAX have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.
BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 3.58% for BBAX.
BBJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while BBAX is Asia Pacific Equities. BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while BBAX tracks Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index.
BBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBJP and BBAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer