DGRC.TO vs. AMDY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DGRC.TO (CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGRC.TO is a Dividend fund managed by CI Investments, while AMDY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Over the past year, DGRC.TO returned 32.94% vs 244.83% for AMDY. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGRC.TO charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDY.

Performance

DGRC.TO vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

DGRC.TO is traded in CAD, while AMDY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMDY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRC.TO achieves a 14.54% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 113.17% return.

DGRC.TO

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 14.54%
• 6M: 14.94%
• 1Y: 32.94%
• 3Y*: 20.12%
• 5Y*: 12.71%
• 10Y*: —

AMDY

• 1D: 3.81%
• 1M: 49.69%
• YTD: 113.17%
• 6M: 110.98%
• 1Y: 244.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRC.TO vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DGRC.TO CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF	14.54%	27.20%	12.36%	1.98%
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	113.17%	46.87%	-9.87%	24.32%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRC.TO and AMDY is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023	0.23

The correlation between DGRC.TO and AMDY shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DGRC.TO vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRC.TO

DGRC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DGRC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DGRC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
DGRC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DGRC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

AMDY

AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 93
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRC.TO vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DGRC.TO	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.86	4.65	-1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.88	4.66	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.65	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.52	8.55	-3.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.77	19.25	+1.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DGRC.TO vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is lower than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 4.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRC.TO and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DGRC.TO	AMDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86	4.65	-1.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	1.31	-0.49

Drawdowns

DGRC.TO vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRC.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.59%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -51.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRC.TO and AMDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGRC.TO	AMDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.59%	-51.17%	+14.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.99%	-28.82%	+22.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	0.00%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-16.91%	+13.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	12.78%	-11.19%

Volatility

DGRC.TO vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) is 2.59%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 20.83%. This indicates that DGRC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGRC.TO	AMDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	20.83%	-18.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.16%	39.49%	-30.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.58%	53.04%	-41.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.47%	45.38%	-32.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.73%	45.38%	-30.65%

DGRC.TO vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRC.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGRC.TO vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

DGRC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than AMDY's 54.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF	54.91%	80.68%	109.98%	6.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DGRC.TO CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF	2.41%	2.58%	2.46%	2.56%	2.48%	1.87%	3.06%	2.20%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGRC.TO and AMDY in my portfolio?

DGRC.TO and AMDY have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DGRC.TO or AMDY?

On fees, DGRC.TO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGRC.TO or AMDY?

DGRC.TO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDY.

What is the main difference between DGRC.TO and AMDY?

DGRC.TO is categorized as Dividend, while AMDY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for DGRC.TO and 0.99% for AMDY.