PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGOC vs. CIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGOC vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - October (DGOC) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGOC achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 21.55% return.


DGOC

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.62%
YTD
3.62%
6M
4.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CIBR

1D
-4.41%
1M
23.56%
YTD
21.55%
6M
16.15%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
25.83%
5Y*
14.99%
10Y*
17.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGOC vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DGOC and CIBR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGOC vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGOC

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGOC vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - October (DGOC) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DGOC vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGOCCIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.80

0.64

+1.16

Drawdowns

DGOC vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGOC drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGOC and CIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGOCCIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-33.89%

+30.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-8.08%

+7.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.39%

-8.66%

+8.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.27%

Volatility

DGOC vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGOCCIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

24.91%

-20.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.70%

25.02%

-20.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.70%

23.64%

-18.94%

DGOC vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGOC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGOC vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

DGOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.47%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
DGOC
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGOC and CIBR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DGOC.

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.00% for DGOC.

DGOC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DGOC and 0.60% for CIBR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGOC and CIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer