PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGCB vs. DFAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DGCB vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DGCB vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DGCB
Dimensional Global Credit ETF
-0.05%6.68%3.80%6.14%
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
-2.67%16.78%23.17%10.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGCB achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly higher than DFAU's -2.67% return.


DGCB

1D
0.14%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.38%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFAU

1D
0.71%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
-0.51%
1Y
19.02%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DGCB vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGCB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

DGCB vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGCB
DGCB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAU
DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGCB vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGCBDFAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

1.03

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.48

1.56

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.56

+0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.45

7.42

-1.97

DGCB vs. DFAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the DFAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGCB and DFAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGCBDFAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.03

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.46

0.80

+0.66

Correlation

The correlation between DGCB and DFAU is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DGCB vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison

DGCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than DFAU's 1.03% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
DGCB
Dimensional Global Credit ETF
2.85%3.43%4.72%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
1.03%0.95%1.10%1.29%1.40%1.00%0.13%

Drawdowns

DGCB vs. DFAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGCB drawdown since its inception was -3.50%, smaller than the maximum DFAU drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGCB and DFAU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DGCBDFAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-23.61%

+20.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-12.45%

+9.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

-5.36%

+3.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-5.12%

+4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

2.62%

-1.73%

Volatility

DGCB vs. DFAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) is 2.16%, while Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that DGCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DGCBDFAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.16%

5.39%

-3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

9.67%

-6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.48%

18.52%

-14.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.82%

17.03%

-12.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.82%

16.87%

-12.05%