DFVE vs. TDVG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DFVE (Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DFVE is passively managed, while TDVG is actively managed. Over the past year, DFVE returned 25.75% vs 19.23% for TDVG. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DFVE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

DFVE vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFVE achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly higher than TDVG's 10.93% return.

DFVE

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.35%
• 6M: 10.99%
• YTD: 15.30%
• 1Y: 25.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.09%

TDVG

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 9.09%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 1Y: 19.23%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFVE Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF	$74.40K	$88.82K	$191.24K
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	$2.11M	$3.07M	$2.63M

DFVE vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DFVE Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF	15.30%	14.51%	14.66%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	10.93%	14.80%	12.62%

Correlation

The correlation between DFVE and TDVG is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024	0.88

The correlation between DFVE and TDVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFVE vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFVE	TDVG
Industrials	17.9%	14.4%
Consumer Cyclical	16.6%	6.7%
Financial Services	15.6%	19.3%
Technology	11.5%	27.4%
Healthcare	10.4%	12.8%
Consumer Defensive	8.1%	6.6%
Energy	5.6%	4.5%
Utilities	5.4%	3.2%
Basic Materials	4.0%	2.8%
Communication Services	3.8%	0.8%
Real Estate	1.3%	1.5%

Return for Risk

DFVE vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFVE

DFVE Risk / Return Rank: 82
DFVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
DFVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
DFVE Omega Ratio Rank: 80
DFVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
DFVE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 80
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFVE vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFVE	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	1.87	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.69	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.34	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	2.51	+0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.31	10.48	+0.83

DFVE vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFVE and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFVE vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFVE drawdown since its inception was -19.43%, roughly equal to the maximum TDVG drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVE and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFVE	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.43%	-19.20%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.79%	-7.24%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	-0.92%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.63%	-3.67%	+1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	1.73%	+0.37%

Volatility

DFVE vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.20%. This indicates that DFVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFVE	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	2.20%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.95%	7.30%	+1.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.57%	9.74%	+2.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.28%	13.87%	+1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.28%	13.81%	+1.47%

DFVE vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFVE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFVE vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

DFVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than TDVG's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFVE Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF	1.36%	1.52%	1.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.96%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFVE and TDVG in my portfolio?

DFVE and TDVG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFVE or TDVG?

DFVE has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to TDVG (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVE dropped -19.43% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, DFVE or TDVG?

On 1-year performance, DFVE leads with 25.75% vs 19.23% for TDVG. On fees, DFVE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFVE or TDVG?

Over the 1-year period, DFVE has performed better with a 25.75% return vs 19.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFVE or TDVG?

DFVE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFVE or TDVG?

DFVE has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.96% for TDVG.

What is the main difference between DFVE and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DFVE and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.