PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFVE vs. DCMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFVE vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFVE vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DFVE
Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.77%14.51%13.70%
DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
27.72%6.04%4.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFVE achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 27.72% return.


DFVE

1D
1.90%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
1.77%
6M
3.98%
1Y
16.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DCMT

1D
-1.56%
1M
15.33%
YTD
27.72%
6M
27.84%
1Y
28.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFVE vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFVE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DFVE vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFVE
DFVE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DFVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFVE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DFVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

DCMT
DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFVE vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFVEDCMTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

1.62

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

2.21

-0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.30

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.70

-1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.28

8.42

-2.13

DFVE vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFVE Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFVE and DCMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFVEDCMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.62

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

1.20

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between DFVE and DCMT is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DFVE vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

DFVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than DCMT's 2.88% yield.


TTM20252024
DFVE
Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.52%1.53%
DCMT
DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
2.88%3.67%1.59%

Drawdowns

DFVE vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFVE drawdown since its inception was -19.43%, which is greater than DCMT's maximum drawdown of -11.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVE and DCMT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFVEDCMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.43%

-11.95%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.38%

-11.05%

-2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.79%

-1.56%

-4.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-3.20%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

3.54%

-0.54%

Volatility

DFVE vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) is 4.39%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that DFVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFVEDCMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

8.79%

-4.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.63%

13.24%

-3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

17.57%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

14.83%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.82%

14.83%

+0.99%