DFVE vs. BDGS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).

DFVE and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFVE is a passively managed fund by DoubleLine that tracks the performance of the Barclays Fortune 500 Equal Weighted Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jan 31, 2024. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.

Performance

DFVE vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DFVE vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DFVE Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF	1.77%	14.51%	13.70%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	-1.41%	10.61%	18.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFVE achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's -1.41% return.

DFVE

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: -5.33%
• YTD: 1.77%
• 6M: 3.98%
• 1Y: 16.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: -1.14%
• YTD: -1.41%
• 6M: 0.11%
• 1Y: 10.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFVE vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFVE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.

BDGS

Bridges Capital Tactical ETF

DFVE

Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF

Return for Risk

DFVE vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFVE

DFVE Risk / Return Rank: 54
DFVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
DFVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
DFVE Omega Ratio Rank: 52
DFVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
DFVE Martin Ratio Rank: 62

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 73
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFVE vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFVE	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	0.99	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	1.67	-0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.28	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	1.80	-0.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.28	9.34	-3.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFVE vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFVE Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFVE and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFVE	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	0.99	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	1.51	-0.63

Correlation

The correlation between DFVE and BDGS is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

DFVE vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

DFVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than BDGS's 0.56% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DFVE Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF	1.49%	1.52%	1.53%	0.00%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.56%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%

Drawdowns

DFVE vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFVE drawdown since its inception was -19.43%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVE and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFVE	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.43%	-9.12%	-10.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.38%	-5.85%	-7.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.79%	-2.15%	-3.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.87%	-0.67%	-2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	1.13%	+1.87%

Volatility

DFVE vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 3.39%. This indicates that DFVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFVE	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	3.39%	+1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.63%	5.09%	+4.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.37%	10.70%	+7.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.82%	8.35%	+7.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.82%	8.35%	+7.47%