DFUSX vs. BIMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX).
DFUSX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Sep 23, 1999. BIMSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Sep 29, 2000.
Performance
DFUSX vs. BIMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFUSX vs. BIMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUSX DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio | -7.05% | 17.76% | 24.91% | 26.28% | -18.14% | 28.53% | 18.41% | 32.08% | -4.45% | 21.04% |
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.32% | 6.76% | 3.21% | 5.53% | -8.88% | -1.68% | 7.16% | 6.83% | 0.30% | 2.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFUSX achieves a -7.05% return, which is significantly lower than BIMSX's -0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, DFUSX has outperformed BIMSX with an annualized return of 13.60%, while BIMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.02% annualized return.
DFUSX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -4.63%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 11.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
BIMSX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFUSX vs. BIMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFUSX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BIMSX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFUSX vs. BIMSX — Risk / Return Rank
DFUSX
BIMSX
DFUSX vs. BIMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFUSX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.50 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 2.23 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.29 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 2.43 | -1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.25 | 9.20 | -4.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFUSX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.50 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.30 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.63 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.09 | -0.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFUSX and BIMSX is -0.20. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
DFUSX vs. BIMSX - Dividend Comparison
DFUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than BIMSX's 3.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUSX DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio | 1.14% | 1.04% | 1.24% | 4.17% | 6.24% | 6.57% | 3.82% | 2.74% | 2.64% | 1.56% | 1.95% | 2.87% |
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.56% | 3.50% | 3.44% | 2.81% | 1.81% | 1.90% | 3.08% | 2.16% | 2.14% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
DFUSX vs. BIMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFUSX drawdown since its inception was -54.96%, which is greater than BIMSX's maximum drawdown of -13.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUSX and BIMSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFUSX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.96% | -13.07% | -41.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.10% | -1.87% | -10.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.58% | -13.00% | -11.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.79% | -13.07% | -20.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | -1.48% | -7.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.66% | -1.59% | -9.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 0.49% | +2.13% |
Volatility
DFUSX vs. BIMSX - Volatility Comparison
DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) at 1.05%. This indicates that DFUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFUSX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 1.05% | +3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.64% | 1.67% | +6.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.96% | 2.80% | +15.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 3.86% | +12.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 3.24% | +14.79% |