PortfoliosLab logo
DFUSX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DFUSX and FSKAX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

DFUSX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DFUSX:

0.59

FSKAX:

0.56

Sortino Ratio

DFUSX:

0.87

FSKAX:

0.83

Omega Ratio

DFUSX:

1.13

FSKAX:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

DFUSX:

0.55

FSKAX:

0.51

Martin Ratio

DFUSX:

2.11

FSKAX:

1.91

Ulcer Index

DFUSX:

4.91%

FSKAX:

5.17%

Daily Std Dev

DFUSX:

19.69%

FSKAX:

20.09%

Max Drawdown

DFUSX:

-54.96%

FSKAX:

-35.01%

Current Drawdown

DFUSX:

-5.24%

FSKAX:

-5.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFUSX achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's -1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, DFUSX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 10.62%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.96% annualized return.


DFUSX

YTD

-0.86%

1M

5.91%

6M

-2.22%

1Y

10.73%

3Y*

12.66%

5Y*

12.71%

10Y*

10.62%

FSKAX

YTD

-1.30%

1M

6.00%

6M

-3.27%

1Y

10.36%

3Y*

14.93%

5Y*

15.55%

10Y*

11.96%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio

Fidelity Total Market Index Fund

DFUSX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUSX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DFUSX vs. FSKAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFUSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFUSX is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFUSX is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFUSX is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFUSX is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFUSX is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFUSX is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSKAX is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSKAX is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSKAX is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSKAX is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSKAX is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSKAX is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DFUSX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current DFUSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFUSX and FSKAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

DFUSX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

DFUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than FSKAX's 1.11% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DFUSX
DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio
1.29%1.24%4.17%6.24%6.57%3.82%2.25%2.64%2.13%2.66%2.87%1.81%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
1.11%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.33%2.43%2.49%1.63%

Drawdowns

DFUSX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUSX drawdown since its inception was -54.96%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUSX and FSKAX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

DFUSX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) have volatilities of 4.37% and 4.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...