DFUS vs. SPTM
DFUS (Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DFUS is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFUS returned 22.42%/yr vs 21.90%/yr for SPTM. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFUS charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
DFUS vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFUS having a 11.25% return and SPTM slightly lower at 11.10%.
DFUS
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 28.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
DFUS vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.46% | 24.34% | 26.36% | -18.34% | 11.90% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 11.10% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -17.75% | 12.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFUS and SPTM is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 1.00 |
The correlation between DFUS and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFUS vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFUS
SPTM
Communication Services
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
DFUS
SPTM
Financial Services
DFUS
SPTM
Technology
DFUS
SPTM
Consumer Cyclical
DFUS
SPTM
Industrials
DFUS
SPTM
Energy
DFUS
SPTM
Healthcare
DFUS
SPTM
Utilities
DFUS
SPTM
Consumer Defensive
DFUS
SPTM
Basic Materials
DFUS
SPTM
Real Estate
DFUS
SPTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFUS vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
DFUS
SPTM
DFUS vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFUS | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 3.22 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.70 | 15.01 | -0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFUS | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.36 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.46 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
DFUS vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFUS drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUS and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFUS | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.62% | -54.80% | +30.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -8.68% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -18.87% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.67% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -9.05% | +3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.86% | +0.09% |
Volatility
DFUS vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) at 2.88%. This indicates that DFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFUS | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 2.88% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.18% | 8.92% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.23% | 11.88% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 16.87% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 18.03% | -0.82% |
DFUS vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFUS vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
DFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than SPTM's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 0.83% | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.48% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, DFUS and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DFUS has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to SPTM (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUS dropped -24.62% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 3-year performance, DFUS leads with 22.42% vs 21.90% for SPTM. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 22.42% return vs 21.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for DFUS.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.83% for DFUS.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DFUS and 0.03% for SPTM.
SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFUS and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer