PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFUS vs. DFAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFUS vs. DFAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFUS achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly lower than DFAT's 19.60% return.


DFUS

1D
0.69%
1M
-0.02%
6M
8.87%
YTD
10.53%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.94%

DFAT

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.65%
6M
12.28%
YTD
19.60%
1Y
34.62%
3Y*
14.22%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$27.35M$25.25M$22.69M
$49.84M$58.02M$61.09M

DFUS vs. DFAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
10.53%17.46%24.34%26.36%-18.34%12.07%
DFAT
Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF
19.60%8.73%7.80%20.86%-6.23%3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between DFUS and DFAT is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021

0.77

The correlation between DFUS and DFAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DFUS vs. DFAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFUS
DFAT

Technology

36.4%
7.9%

Financial Services

13.1%
29.1%

Healthcare

9.6%
7.0%

Industrials

9.2%
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
14.1%

Communication Services

9.0%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
7.3%

Energy

3.8%
10.0%

Utilities

2.7%
0.4%

Basic Materials

2.3%
5.5%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.8%

Technology

DFUS
36.4%
DFAT
7.9%

Financial Services

DFUS
13.1%
DFAT
29.1%

Healthcare

DFUS
9.6%
DFAT
7.0%

Industrials

DFUS
9.2%
DFAT
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DFUS
9.0%
DFAT
14.1%

Communication Services

DFUS
9.0%
DFAT
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

DFUS
4.6%
DFAT
7.3%

Energy

DFUS
3.8%
DFAT
10.0%

Utilities

DFUS
2.7%
DFAT
0.4%

Basic Materials

DFUS
2.3%
DFAT
5.5%

Real Estate

DFUS
0.1%
DFAT
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFUS vs. DFAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFUS
DFUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAT
DFAT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DFAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFUS vs. DFAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFUSDFATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.36

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.37

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

11.35

-1.68

DFUS vs. DFAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the DFAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFUS and DFAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFUS vs. DFAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUS drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, smaller than the maximum DFAT drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUS and DFAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFUSDFATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.62%

-26.12%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-9.55%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-26.12%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.62%

-26.12%

+1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-1.10%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-6.12%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.83%

-0.74%

Volatility

DFUS vs. DFAT - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) at 3.42%. This indicates that DFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFUSDFATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

3.42%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.43%

10.32%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.28%

16.08%

-2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

21.19%

-3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

21.26%

-4.10%

DFUS vs. DFAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAT's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFUS vs. DFAT - Dividend Comparison

DFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than DFAT's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFAT
Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF
1.36%1.55%1.31%1.34%1.34%1.13%
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
0.86%0.88%1.04%1.33%1.48%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFUS and DFAT have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFUS has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to DFAT (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUS dropped -24.62% vs DFAT's -26.12%.

On 5-year performance, DFUS leads with 12.49% vs 11.52% for DFAT. On fees, DFUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DFAT has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 12.49% return vs 11.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DFAT.

DFAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.86% for DFUS.

DFUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DFAT is Small Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DFUS and 0.28% for DFAT.

DFAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFUS and DFAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer