PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFUS vs. DFIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFUS vs. DFIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DFUS having a 12.16% return and DFIC slightly higher at 12.58%.


DFUS

1D
1.47%
1M
1.45%
6M
9.83%
YTD
12.16%
1Y
23.97%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.24%

DFIC

1D
0.42%
1M
1.70%
6M
6.42%
YTD
12.58%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$72.09M$73.19M$55.03M
$53.44M$56.99M$61.31M

DFUS vs. DFIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
12.16%17.46%24.34%26.36%-12.67%
DFIC
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF
12.58%37.09%4.10%17.32%-8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between DFUS and DFIC is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022

0.75

The correlation between DFUS and DFIC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFUS vs. DFIC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFUS
DFIC

Technology

36.4%
9.2%

Financial Services

13.1%
21.3%

Healthcare

9.6%
7.3%

Industrials

9.2%
19.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
9.6%

Communication Services

9.0%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
6.3%

Energy

3.8%
6.8%

Utilities

2.7%
3.4%

Basic Materials

2.3%
10.6%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.7%

Technology

DFUS
36.4%
DFIC
9.2%

Financial Services

DFUS
13.1%
DFIC
21.3%

Healthcare

DFUS
9.6%
DFIC
7.3%

Industrials

DFUS
9.2%
DFIC
19.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DFUS
9.0%
DFIC
9.6%

Communication Services

DFUS
9.0%
DFIC
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

DFUS
4.6%
DFIC
6.3%

Energy

DFUS
3.8%
DFIC
6.8%

Utilities

DFUS
2.7%
DFIC
3.4%

Basic Materials

DFUS
2.3%
DFIC
10.6%

Real Estate

DFUS
0.1%
DFIC
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFUS vs. DFIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFUS
DFUS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIC
DFIC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DFIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFUS vs. DFIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFUSDFICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

2.50

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.50

9.86

+1.64

DFUS vs. DFIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the DFIC Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFUS and DFIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFUS vs. DFIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUS drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, roughly equal to the maximum DFIC drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUS and DFIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFUSDFICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.62%

-24.40%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-11.00%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-13.14%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.16%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-4.43%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.78%

-0.69%

Volatility

DFUS vs. DFIC - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) have volatilities of 3.98% and 4.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFUSDFICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

4.02%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

12.38%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.25%

14.44%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

16.16%

+1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

16.16%

+1.00%

DFUS vs. DFIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIC's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFUS vs. DFIC - Dividend Comparison

DFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than DFIC's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFIC
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF
2.36%2.54%2.87%2.55%1.47%0.00%
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
0.85%0.88%1.04%1.33%1.48%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFUS and DFIC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFIC has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to DFUS (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUS dropped -24.62% vs DFIC's -24.40%.

On 3-year performance, DFUS leads with 20.71% vs 19.29% for DFIC. On fees, DFUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 20.71% return vs 19.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for DFIC.

DFIC has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.85% for DFUS.

DFUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DFIC is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DFUS and 0.22% for DFIC.

DFIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFUS and DFIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer