DFSI vs. SPDW
DFSI (Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF) and SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DFSI is actively managed, while SPDW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFSI returned 16.80%/yr vs 19.77%/yr for SPDW. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFSI charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPDW.
Performance
DFSI vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSI achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 15.00% return.
DFSI
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 16.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDW
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- 15.00%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 32.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
DFSI vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSI Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 5.54% | 33.62% | 4.98% | 17.86% | 11.99% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 15.00% | 34.75% | 3.55% | 17.81% | 10.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSI and SPDW is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between DFSI and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFSI vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFSI
SPDW
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
DFSI
SPDW
Financial Services
DFSI
SPDW
Consumer Cyclical
DFSI
SPDW
Consumer Defensive
DFSI
SPDW
Basic Materials
DFSI
SPDW
Healthcare
DFSI
SPDW
Real Estate
DFSI
SPDW
Technology
DFSI
SPDW
Communication Services
DFSI
SPDW
Utilities
DFSI
SPDW
Energy
DFSI
SPDW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSI vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank
DFSI
SPDW
DFSI vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFSI | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.37 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 2.80 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 10.93 | -4.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFSI | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 2.07 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.36 | 0.24 | +1.12 |
Drawdowns
DFSI vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSI drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSI and SPDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSI | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.82% | -60.02% | +47.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -11.55% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.82% | -13.53% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -0.87% | -2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.62% | -12.91% | +10.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 2.95% | +0.27% |
Volatility
DFSI vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF (DFSI) is 4.63%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that DFSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSI | SPDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 5.63% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 13.17% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 15.60% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 16.49% | -1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 17.26% | -2.02% |
DFSI vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSI has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFSI vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison
DFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than SPDW's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSI Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF | 2.14% | 2.23% | 2.39% | 2.10% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 2.87% | 3.30% | 3.19% | 2.75% | 3.12% | 3.04% | 1.87% | 3.13% | 3.08% | 1.86% | 3.11% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DFSI and SPDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPDW has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to DFSI (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSI dropped -12.82% vs SPDW's -60.02%.
On 3-year performance, SPDW leads with 19.77% vs 16.80% for DFSI. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DFSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 19.77% return vs 16.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for DFSI.
SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.14% for DFSI.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DFSI and 0.04% for SPDW.
SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSI and SPDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer