DFSCX vs. VO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DFSCX (DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both funds - DFSCX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Dimensional, while VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, DFSCX returned 11.53%/yr vs 11.77%/yr for VO. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFSCX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.

Performance

DFSCX vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSCX achieves a 19.26% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DFSCX having a 11.53% annualized return and VO not far ahead at 11.77%.

DFSCX

• 1D: 2.35%
• 1M: 6.42%
• YTD: 19.26%
• 6M: 16.19%
• 1Y: 38.65%
• 3Y*: 17.49%
• 5Y*: 9.29%
• 10Y*: 11.53%

VO

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 2.97%
• YTD: 10.43%
• 6M: 9.31%
• 1Y: 19.60%
• 3Y*: 15.74%
• 5Y*: 7.79%
• 10Y*: 11.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSCX vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFSCX DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio	19.26%	9.65%	11.43%	17.93%	-12.49%	33.70%	6.61%	20.68%	-11.60%	10.92%
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF	10.43%	11.62%	15.31%	16.03%	-18.73%	24.70%	18.10%	30.98%	-9.24%	19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSCX and VO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004	0.88

The correlation between DFSCX and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DFSCX vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSCX

DFSCX Risk / Return Rank: 79
DFSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
DFSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
DFSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
DFSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DFSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

VO

VO Risk / Return Rank: 49
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSCX vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFSCX	VO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	1.43	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	2.05	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.25	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.37	2.23	+2.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.12	8.44	+5.68

DFSCX vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSCX and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFSCX vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSCX drawdown since its inception was -63.07%, which is greater than VO's maximum drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSCX and VO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFSCX	VO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.07%	-58.87%	-4.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.17%	-8.17%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.01%	-19.02%	-7.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.01%	-27.57%	+0.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.88%	-39.37%	-7.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.45%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.90%	-7.85%	-2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	2.16%	+0.37%

Volatility

DFSCX vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.31%. This indicates that DFSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFSCX	VO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.02%	4.31%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.99%	9.71%	+2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.79%	12.74%	+5.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.05%	17.65%	+3.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.65%	18.96%	+3.69%

DFSCX vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSCX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFSCX vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

DFSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than VO's 1.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFSCX DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio	0.80%	1.03%	0.97%	2.48%	5.16%	10.77%	0.87%	2.80%	5.50%	5.05%	0.90%	6.33%
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF	1.36%	1.52%	1.49%	1.52%	1.60%	1.12%	1.45%	1.48%	1.82%	1.35%	1.45%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFSCX and VO in my portfolio?

DFSCX and VO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFSCX or VO?

DFSCX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to VO (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSCX dropped -63.07% vs VO's -58.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.