DFNV vs. TINY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DFNV (TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF) and TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - DFNV tracks the TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index while TINY tracks the Solactive Nanotechnology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFNV returned 18.75%/yr vs 30.24%/yr for TINY. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFNV charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for TINY.

Performance

DFNV vs. TINY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNV achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than TINY's 55.62% return.

DFNV

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 10.83%
• YTD: 2.81%
• 6M: 0.55%
• 1Y: 7.23%
• 3Y*: 18.75%
• 5Y*: 9.65%
• 10Y*: —

TINY

• 1D: -2.60%
• 1M: 7.29%
• YTD: 55.62%
• 6M: 55.41%
• 1Y: 105.71%
• 3Y*: 30.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNV vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF	2.81%	8.42%	31.93%	26.92%	-24.05%	3.06%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	55.62%	19.98%	6.63%	47.97%	-34.14%	8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNV and TINY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between DFNV and TINY has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DFNV vs. TINY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFNV	TINY
Technology	60.9%	79.0%
Healthcare	16.2%	8.6%
Communication Services	12.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	-
Industrials	1.9%	4.7%
Basic Materials	-	7.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DFNV vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNV

DFNV Risk / Return Rank: 15
DFNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
DFNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
DFNV Omega Ratio Rank: 15
DFNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
DFNV Martin Ratio Rank: 13

TINY

TINY Risk / Return Rank: 89
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNV vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFNV	TINY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	3.25	-2.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.67	3.75	-3.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.49	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	6.35	-6.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.81	22.33	-21.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFNV vs. TINY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNV Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the TINY Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNV and TINY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFNV	TINY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41	3.25	-2.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.55	-0.01

Drawdowns

DFNV vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNV drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum TINY drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNV and TINY.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFNV	TINY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.71%	-43.79%	+14.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.54%	-16.75%	-4.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.72%	-42.13%	+19.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.08%	-2.60%	-1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.47%	-16.15%	+6.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.91%	4.75%	+4.16%

Volatility

DFNV vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) is 6.62%, while ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a volatility of 11.69%. This indicates that DFNV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFNV	TINY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.62%	11.69%	-5.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.85%	26.55%	-11.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.67%	32.75%	-15.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.65%	32.38%	-12.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.73%	32.38%	-12.65%

DFNV vs. TINY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNV has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than TINY's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFNV vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison

DFNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than TINY's 0.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF	0.37%	0.38%	1.28%	0.77%	1.20%	4.77%	0.02%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	0.19%	0.29%	0.01%	0.35%	0.42%	0.07%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFNV and TINY in my portfolio?

DFNV and TINY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFNV or TINY?

TINY has higher volatility (11.69%) compared to DFNV (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFNV dropped -29.71% vs TINY's -43.79%.

Which ETF is better, DFNV or TINY?

On 3-year performance, TINY leads with 30.24% vs 18.75% for DFNV. On fees, TINY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DFNV has been the lower-risk option at 6.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFNV or TINY?

Over the 3-year period, TINY has performed better with a 30.24% return vs 18.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFNV or TINY?

TINY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFNV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFNV or TINY?

DFNV has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.19% for TINY.

What is the main difference between DFNV and TINY?

DFNV tracks TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index, while TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index. They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for DFNV and 0.58% for TINY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.