PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DFNS.L vs. IGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DFNS.L vs. IGF

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DFNS.L (VanEck Defense UCITS ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFNS.L is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the MarketVector™ Global Defense Industry Index, while IGF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFNS.L returned 40.45%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for IGF. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFNS.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.

Performance

DFNS.L vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNS.L achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 9.68% return.

DFNS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
0.90%
6M
2.54%
1Y
12.91%
3Y*
40.45%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

IGF

1D
0.67%
1M
0.31%
YTD
9.68%
6M
10.24%
1Y
16.24%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
8.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNS.L vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFNS.L
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF		0.90%68.21%43.74%25.97%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF		9.68%21.31%14.81%2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNS.L and IGF is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2023

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Defense UCITS ETF

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF

Often compared with DFNS.L:
DFNS.L vs. NATO.LDFNS.L vs. DFEN.DEDFNS.L vs. DFND.ASDFNS.L vs. PPADFNS.L vs. VOODFNS.L vs. WDEF.LDFNS.L vs. IBE.MC
Often compared with IGF:
IGF vs. IFRAIGF vs. GIIIGF vs. NFRAIGF vs. SPYIGF vs. GLIFXIGF vs. VPUIGF vs. XLU

Return for Risk

DFNS.L vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DFNS.L
DFNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
DFNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
IGF
IGF Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNS.L vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DFNS.LIGFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.52
1.55

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.91
2.22

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.27

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

2.78

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.61

8.03

-6.42

DFNS.L vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNS.L and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFNS.L vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNS.L drawdown since its inception was -19.66%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNS.L and IGF.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DFNS.LIGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.66%

-58.33%

+38.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.66%

-5.87%

-13.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.66%

-14.28%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-20.83%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-42.11%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.48%

-2.98%

-14.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-11.86%

+8.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.00%

2.04%

+5.96%

Volatility

DFNS.L vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.85%. This indicates that DFNS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DFNS.LIGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

3.85%

+4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.56%

8.73%

+10.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.07%

10.58%

+14.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.58%

14.00%

+7.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

16.83%

+4.75%

DFNS.L vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNS.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFNS.L vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

DFNS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFNS.L
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF		2.94%3.23%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.98%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

DFNS.L and IGF have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFNS.L.

DFNS.L is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while IGF is Industrials Equities. DFNS.L tracks MarketVector™ Global Defense Industry Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DFNS.L and 0.39% for IGF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNS.L and IGF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer