PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNS.L vs. DFEN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFNS.L vs. DFEN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) and VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFNS.L vs. DFEN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFNS.L
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF
6.45%68.21%43.74%10.99%
DFEN.DE
VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A
6.64%70.20%43.28%9.83%
Different Trading Currencies

DFNS.L is traded in USD, while DFEN.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DFEN.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNS.L achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly lower than DFEN.DE's 6.83% return.


DFNS.L

1D
0.15%
1M
-9.55%
YTD
6.45%
6M
-0.47%
1Y
45.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFEN.DE

1D
1.15%
1M
-5.95%
YTD
6.83%
6M
0.97%
1Y
49.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFNS.L vs. DFEN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DFNS.L and DFEN.DE have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Return for Risk

DFNS.L vs. DFEN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNS.L
DFNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DFNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

DFEN.DE
DFEN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DFEN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNS.L vs. DFEN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) and VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFNS.LDFEN.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

1.84

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

2.48

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.31

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.16

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.30

8.57

-0.27

DFNS.L vs. DFEN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the DFEN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNS.L and DFEN.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFNS.LDFEN.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.84

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.28

2.10

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between DFNS.L and DFEN.DE is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DFNS.L vs. DFEN.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFNS.L nor DFEN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DFNS.L vs. DFEN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNS.L drawdown since its inception was -14.92%, roughly equal to the maximum DFEN.DE drawdown of -14.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNS.L and DFEN.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNS.LDFEN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.92%

-14.00%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.92%

-14.00%

-0.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.94%

-11.61%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-2.71%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

5.65%

-0.15%

Volatility

DFNS.L vs. DFEN.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Defense UCITS ETF (DFNS.L) and VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) have volatilities of 8.01% and 7.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFNS.LDFEN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.01%

7.92%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.61%

19.14%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.60%

26.63%

-1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.07%

21.65%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.07%

21.65%

-0.58%