PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFND vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFND vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, DFND has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 7.16%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.


DFND

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-1.09%
1Y
0.20%
3Y*
7.91%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
7.16%

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFND vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.00%10.37%8.48%12.13%-19.59%14.80%16.12%19.53%-1.83%16.33%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DFND and VTI is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2016

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between DFND and VTI has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DFND vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFND
VTI

Technology

24.8%
33.5%

Financial Services

18.2%
12.0%

Industrials

17.1%
9.8%

Healthcare

10.7%
9.2%

Basic Materials

4.3%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
10.0%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.4%

Energy

1.7%
3.7%

Communication Services

0.8%
10.3%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

DFND
24.8%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

DFND
18.2%
VTI
12.0%

Industrials

DFND
17.1%
VTI
9.8%

Healthcare

DFND
10.7%
VTI
9.2%

Basic Materials

DFND
4.3%
VTI
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

DFND
4.2%
VTI
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DFND
3.5%
VTI
10.0%

Real Estate

DFND
2.0%
VTI
2.4%

Energy

DFND
1.7%
VTI
3.7%

Communication Services

DFND
0.8%
VTI
10.3%

Utilities

DFND

-

VTI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFND vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFND
DFND Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFND vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFNDVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.42

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

3.17

-3.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.13

14.62

-14.50

DFND vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFND Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFND and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFNDVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

2.33

-2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.73

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.82

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.51

-0.15

Drawdowns

DFND vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFND drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFND and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNDVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-55.45%

+32.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.44%

-8.92%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.56%

-19.30%

+6.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.65%

-25.36%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.65%

-35.00%

+12.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-0.72%

-2.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-8.03%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

1.93%

+1.77%

Volatility

DFND vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) is 0.00%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that DFND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNDVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

2.96%

-2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.16%

9.13%

-2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.92%

12.17%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.46%

17.40%

+5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.09%

18.30%

+0.79%

DFND vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFND vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

DFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.62%1.10%1.64%1.84%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.53%0.02%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFND and VTI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFND dropped -22.65% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.05% vs 7.16% for DFND. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.05% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.

DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DFND and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFND and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer