PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFND vs. USMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFND vs. USMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DFND

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USMV

1D
0.06%
1M
2.16%
6M
3.87%
YTD
4.64%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
11.43%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFND vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.00%10.37%8.48%12.13%-19.59%14.80%16.12%19.53%-1.83%16.33%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
4.64%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%

Correlation

The correlation between DFND and USMV is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between DFND and USMV has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DFND vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFND
USMV

Technology

24.8%
33.9%

Financial Services

18.2%
11.7%

Industrials

17.1%
6.1%

Healthcare

10.7%
12.6%

Basic Materials

4.3%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
5.7%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.5%

Energy

1.7%
2.7%

Communication Services

0.8%
6.2%

Utilities

-

6.9%

Technology

DFND
24.8%
USMV
33.9%

Financial Services

DFND
18.2%
USMV
11.7%

Industrials

DFND
17.1%
USMV
6.1%

Healthcare

DFND
10.7%
USMV
12.6%

Basic Materials

DFND
4.3%
USMV
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

DFND
4.2%
USMV
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DFND
3.5%
USMV
5.7%

Real Estate

DFND
2.0%
USMV
2.5%

Energy

DFND
1.7%
USMV
2.7%

Communication Services

DFND
0.8%
USMV
6.2%

Utilities

DFND

-

USMV
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFND vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFND vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFNDUSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

DFND vs. USMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFND vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNDUSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

Volatility

DFND vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNDUSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.49%

DFND vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFND vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison

DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.29%1.10%1.64%1.84%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.53%0.02%0.00%0.00%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.48%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFND and USMV have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USMV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USMV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.29% for DFND.

DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index, while USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DFND and 0.15% for USMV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFND and USMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer